Search for: "Grant v. Department of Corrections" Results 401 - 420 of 3,038
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The effect of s97 is limited to the life of proceedings (Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878, [2007] 1 FLR 1). [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 6:52 am by Berry Law
         Part V Part five is additional remarks. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National Archives Asks Justice Dept. to Investigate Trump’s Handling of White House Records MSN – Matt Zapotosky, Jacqueline Alemany, Ashley Parker, and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 2/9/2022 The National Archives and Records Administration asked the Justice Department to examine Donald Trump’s handling of White House records. [read post]
In late October, the Department of Justice (DOJ) resolved its first-ever criminal enforcement actions brought under the CPSA against corporations. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 2:57 pm by Russell Knight
” 410 ILCS 535/17(d) If you were granted leave to change your name via the judgment for dissolution of marriage, you must file this Affidavit and Certificate of Correction Request in order for the state of Illinois to modify all of your state records to reflect your new name. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm by ACLU
And the Department of Justice filed court briefing opposing religious exemptions under Title VII for a teacher who resigned after refusing to use transgender students’ correct names and pronouns. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Phil Dixon
Findings of fact failed to resolve material conflicts in the evidence from suppression hearing; denial of motion to suppress vacated and remanded for new findings State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 11:36 am by Phil Dixon
He therefore failed to meet the subjective prong of a deliberate indifference claim, and the district court was correct to grant summary judgment to the defendants on this claim as well. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by NRF Digital Team
In accordance with Moodley v Department of National Treasury [2017] ZALAC 5; (2017) 38 ILJ 1098 (LAC), it is a failure not to take cognisance of section 193(2) and to consider whether reinstatement might be inappropriate. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
At the time of writing, there was no news on whether the Supreme Court will grant it permission to do so.3. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
Department of Justice, tasked with overseeing federal prisons and enforcing Prohibition, since 1921. [read post]