Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 401 - 420 of 6,537
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2009, 3:36 pm
The trial court granted the defendant's request and, on appeal, the Superior Court affirmed.In so ruling, the Superior Court weighed two conflicting public policies against each other. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 1:17 pm
You don't see too many venue cases in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 9:00 am
Superior Court (Criminal Contempt; refusal to testify; writ of error; immunity granted under § 54-47a; "The plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that the state may limit its offer of immunity to use immunity. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:45 am
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently granted a temporary injunction prohibiting unauthorized persons from entering or occupying an Enbridge Pipelines Inc. valve installation site in Innerkip, Ontario, near Woodstock. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:58 am by Matt C. Bailey
Superior Court, __ Cal.App. 4th __ (2010), concluding that a proposed class of employees governed by Wage Order 16 were entitled to premium meal period wages for second meal periods notwithstanding Division Four’s prior opinion in Bearden v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:20 am by Maxwell Kennerly
The Superior Court ruled that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment before the additional discovery was completed. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 9:14 am by Steven G. Pearl
For claims arising before October 1, 2000, the trial court granted the motion for summary adjudication on grounds that the Bell v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:05 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The Court framed the issues to be reviewed as follows:  "(1) Whether the Superior Court improperly interpreted § 1797 of the MVFRL,the Supreme Court case of Herd Chiropractic v. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 10:03 am by Francis Pileggi
The Delaware Superior Court recently dismissed Jarden LLC’s bid for D&O insurance coverage for an appraisal suit that was not “for” redress of a “wrongful act” – and even if it was, the act couldn’t have occurred before the sale to Jewel Rubbermaid Inc. closed, ending the coverage period, in Jarden LLC v. [read post]