Search for: "Graphic Packaging"
Results 401 - 420
of 801
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
Relevant education and training in design field with solid typography and graphic design skills. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 9:30 pm
Court of Appeals for an en banc review of a decision to throw out rules requiring cigarette packaging and advertisements to include graphic images of the health risks of smoking. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 1:36 am
Graphic health warnings, showing the harm the disease can cause, will cover 90% of the back of the packaging and 70% of the front. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 12:01 pm
Beese added that this is another type of video - there are no attorneys speaking, but they used graphics to communicate ideas. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:48 am
The ongoing shift in how information and work product is created, stored, gathered, processed and packaged for clients will continue to evolve the workplace paradigm, which will inevitably include workplace location. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 9:15 am
The court found that the graphic warnings were not necessary to prevent current cigarette packaging from misleading consumers, nor that the warnings imparted "purely factual, accurate, or uncontroversial information. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 9:15 am
The court found that the graphic warnings were not necessary to prevent current cigarette packaging from misleading consumers, nor that the warnings imparted "purely factual, accurate, or uncontroversial information. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 2:59 am
The Sell By Date is located on the back of the package, in the middle, above the sunflower graphics,? [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 7:53 pm
In brief, Judge Leon had applied strict scrutiny to FDA’s regulation requiring the display on cigarette packages of graphic warnings intended to dissuade would-be smokers, and concluded that the regulation was not “narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling government interest. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:27 am
” It is becoming more and more likely, as we predicted back in March, that the constitutional challenge to the FDA’s new color graphic warnings requirement on cigarette packages will end up at the U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 7:06 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia struck down a Food and Drug Administration regulation requiring tobacco companies to display graphic images on cigarette packages. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:00 pm
Circuit, 2-1, applied strict scrutiny in delivering the tobacco industry a First Amendment victory over the FDA’s regulations requiring anti-smoking graphics on cigarette packages and ads. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 6:48 am
Circuit recently held that the FDA cannot require tobacco companies to put graphic warnings on cigarette packages without violating the company’s First Amendment rights, creating a circuit split with the Sixth Circuit and therefore the prospect that the issue could reach the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 5:54 am
And Nothing Changes Apple earns $1 billion victory over Samsung in patent case Guergis to appeal dismissed lawsuit against Harper - CBC.ca US Appeals court rejects graphic anti-tobacco packaging - Rachel Spence, Law Clerk Visit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net WRONGFUL DISMISSAL • CIVIL LITIGATION AND ESTATE LITIGATION • FAMILY LAW AND DIVORCE ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOG • SUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG Visit our website:… [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:28 pm
Tobacco Advertising & Packaging: In R.J. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 12:47 pm
As TeenJury reported in March, the Food and Drug Administration instituted a new requirement for cigarette manufacturers to place graphic warning labels on their packaging. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 5:13 am
Circuit on Friday struck down FDA regulations requiring graphic warnings on cigarette packages, affirming, through different legal analysis, the district court and parting company with the Sixth Circuit, which upheld the graphic requirements. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm
Circuit ruled 2-1 against the FDA, finding that proposed graphic warnings on cigarette packages were unconstitutional. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Friday that tobacco companies do not need to print graphic warnings of the dangers of smoking on cigarette packages. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 10:08 am
A federal appeals court in a split ruling on Friday struck down requirements for large graphic warning labels on cigarette packages, saying the government didn't provide evidence that the labels would bring down smoking rates. [read post]
