Search for: "Gray v. District Court"
Results 401 - 420
of 964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2012, 10:57 am
This court relied on Klein in Seattle Audubon Society v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:13 am
Because “a man of reasonable intelligence would not have believed that exigent circumstances existed in this situation,” we affirm the district court's holding that this no-knock entry violated the Bellottes' clearly established constitutional rights and does not warrant an award of qualified immunity.Bellotte v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:45 am
Well, buck up, Sparky, because after 8th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
This post examines a recent decision from the CaliforniaCourt of Appeals – First District: People v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
The Court also held that interstate nuisance cases arise under the federal "laws" for purposes of federal-question jurisdiction, and so, could be entertained by federal district courts. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:23 am
District Court Judge Otis D. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 5:45 am
But in Blanch v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Byrnes, The Supreme Court [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:22 am
The federal trial court decision two weeks ago in Ballentine v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:18 am
The district court rejected this argument. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:13 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property'Gray Market Goods' Test Used to Find Earlier Version Of Genuine Product 'Counterfeit' Under Lanham ActJohnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 7:00 am
The district court denied the defense request for surrebuttal; Maloney was convicted. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:27 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property'Gray Market' Seeds Not 'Genuine' for Lanham Act; Confusion of 'Sponsorship,' Deception LikelyZip International Group LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:22 pm
KEITHINKING: An unusualy deferential opinion, the Court accepted the U.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
In 1961, the Supreme Court made clear in Monroe v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:37 am
Ward County Appraisal District v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 4:08 am
Gray, 626 F.2d 494, 501 (5th Cir. 1980). [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 4:04 pm
The court cites to US v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 5:57 am
App'x 78, 80 (2d Cir. 2008) ("On a motion for summary judgment, a district court must consider the evidence in the context of whether any reasonable finder of fact—not merely the district court itself—could return a verdict in favor of the non-moving party. [read post]
Keep Your Hooves off My Easement! Exclusive Easement Prevents Servient Landowner from Using Driveway
17 Dec 2008, 7:31 pm
(Otay Water District v. [read post]
