Search for: "Green v. Johns" Results 401 - 420 of 1,467
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:49 pm by Mark Walsh
Greene’s Energy Group LLC, followed by one announced by Gorsuch, in SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Wired uses comment from Mischon de Reya’s John Baines to consider the large volume of emails and requests users may be coming across asking for their consent prior to the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:11 am
This symposium explores these and other issues.Keynote Lecture: James V Feinerman, Associate Dean for Transnational Programs, Co-Director, Georgetown Law Asia, and James M. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:21 am by Adam Feldman
Looking at the number of arguments with the justices’ active participation, we see that only three justices – Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sotomayor – spoke at every oral argument this term. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:37 am by Christopher J. Walker
” This flummoxed Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm by Ronald Mann
Greene’s Energy Group, but losing on the statutory question presented in SAS Institute v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:36 pm by David Markus
Congrats to Judge Wilson for being recognized by the Green Bag for exemplary legal writing for his dissent in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:09 am by Steve Brachmann
Justice Neil Gorsuch penned a dissent to which Chief Justice John Roberts concurred. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm by Hayley Evans
To that end, practices like those espoused in Pentagon policy, requiring autonomous and semi-autonomous weapons systems to undergo “rigorous hardware and software verification and validation (V&V) and realistic system developmental and operational test and evaluation (T&E),” can help reduce the risk of unintended combat engagements. [read post]