Search for: "Grossman v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 6:17 am
v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 7:52 pm
5-Technology-Assisted-Review-Uses- Spring-2020 Chart 6: Survey Responder Overview 6-Predictive-Coding-Technologies-and-Protocols-Survey-Overview-Spring-2020 Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols (Survey Backgrounder) As defined in The Grossman-Cormack Glossary of Technology-Assisted Review (1), Predictive Coding is an industry-specific term generally used to describe a technology-assisted review process involving the use of a machine learning algorithm to… [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 8:14 am
(Question #5) 7-Technology-Assisted-Review-Uses-Fall-2020 Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols (Survey Backgrounder) As defined in The Grossman-Cormack Glossary of Technology-Assisted Review (1), Predictive Coding is an industry-specific term generally used to describe a technology-assisted review process involving the use of a machine learning algorithm to distinguish relevant from non-relevant documents, based on a subject matter expert’s coding of a… [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 4:43 pm
(Question #5) 7 – Technology-Assisted Review Uses – Spring 2021 Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols (Survey Backgrounder) As defined in The Grossman-Cormack Glossary of Technology-Assisted Review (1), Predictive Coding is an industry-specific term generally used to describe a technology-assisted review process involving the use of a machine learning algorithm to distinguish relevant from non-relevant documents, based on a subject matter… [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm
(Question #5) 7 - Technology-Assisted Review Uses - Fall 2021 Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols (Survey Backgrounder) As defined in The Grossman-Cormack Glossary of Technology-Assisted Review (1), Predictive Coding is an industry-specific term generally used to describe a technology-assisted review process involving the use of a machine learning algorithm to distinguish relevant from non-relevant documents, based on a subject matter expert’s coding of a… [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 7:00 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Writing in dissent in Comptroller v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Grossman, and Neil P. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 9:40 pm
Tomorrow, Group 62: Gordo v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
It was declared unconstitutional in 1997 in Boerne v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Grossman, and Neil P. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court has dismissed Moyle v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:01 am
Part II consists of papers by Osofsky on Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
Grossman, 91 AD2d 553 [1st Dept 1982], appeal dismissed, 58 NY2d 1112 [1983]; Tidy-House Paper Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am
Further, the United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Vance v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:38 pm
Grossman (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 937. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:00 am
In Girao v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 1:44 am
On the same day, there was a hearing in the case of Adams v Johnson. [read post]
