Search for: "Group O, Inc." Results 401 - 420 of 2,801
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2021, 5:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
The app, developed by New York-based Docket Health, Inc., also can provide access to family members’ COVID-19 records through a shared account. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am by Sherron Watkins
Hence the call to a New York-based attorney I had worked with in the early 1990s when I lived in Manhattan and worked for a commodity finance group. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
First, Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:50 am
Arain, and Reanne Zheng, Jenner & Block LLP, on Wednesday, July 7, 2021 Tags: Basic, Class actions, Fraud-on-the-Market, Goldman Sachs, Reliance, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities fraud, Securities litigation, Supreme Court CEO Succession Practices in the Russell 3000 and S&P 500 2021 Edition Posted by Matteo Tonello (The Conference Board, Inc.), Jason D. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
A requirement that platforms host speakers without regard to viewpoint would be more comparable to the requirement that compulsory student fees go to student groups without regard to viewpoint (Southworth), or the requirement that shopping malls host speakers without regard to viewpoint (PruneYard), than to a requirement that employees fund a particular advocacy group (Janus).[136] Nor does Wooley v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd, heard 2-3 November 2020 Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd, heard 12 November 2020 R (on the application of TN (Vietnam) v Secretary of… [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 6:14 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Jet Express Transportation Group Ltd. where there was immediate financial risk to a party, the court found it urgent for the matter to proceed. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
.'" Thus, "other legal process" should be understood to be process much like the processes of execution, levy, attachment, and garnishment, and at a minimum, would seem to require utilization of some judicial or quasi-judicial mechanism, though not necessarily an elaborate one, by which control over property passes from one person to another in order to discharge or secure discharge of an allegedly existing or anticipated liability.[11] "[O]therwise… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 8:00 am by Savage Villoch Law, PLLC
The Supreme Court of the United States dealt a blow – at least for now – to plaintiff shareholders as part of its long-awaited June 21, 2021 decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others (Respondents), heard 20-22 October 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd, heard 2-3 November 2020 A and B v… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 23 and Thursday 24 June, the Supreme Court will hear the conjoined cases of R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited). [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
  Media groups have complained that this is a step to state control. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Via Rail Canada Inc. [read post]