Search for: "HALLIBURTON COMPANY" Results 401 - 420 of 820
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2012, 7:27 am by David Hart QC
Bribery allegations against a London solicitor and a former executive of a Halliburton company, and extradition sought by the USA and keenly challenged by the defendants. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 1:48 pm
In addition to the medical and economic damages settlement, BP will also assign the company’s claims against Transocean and Halliburton to the Plaintiff’s Steering Committee. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:06 pm by Michael Fox
In re Frank Kent Motor Company (Tx. 3.9.12).The Court had to look only to its decision a decade earlier, In re Halliburton Co. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 11:07 am
Since the spill occurred, both Halliburton and Transocean have tried to point the finger at BP, claiming that the entire disaster was the fault of the oil company. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 11:16 pm by Richard Frank
According to a New York Times report, BP has agreed to pay $7.8 billion to settle the legal claims filed by the private plaintiffs against the company. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:47 am by admin
Halliburton decision in September 2011 in which the ARB adopted a broad interpretation of the anti-retaliation provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
Follow @InfoGovernance   eDiscovery News Content and Considerations A Billion Dollar Fix for Free - http://bit.ly/zD4RXW (Craig Ball) A Practical Guide To Responding To Government Investigations - bit.ly/zS0diw (Roderick Thomas, Mark Sweet) A Good eDiscovery Team: eDiscovery Lawyers – Part II - bit.ly/AwOmmY (Dennis Kiker) All’s “Well” for Halliburton: No Sanctions Result from BP’s Spoliation Claims | Cozen O’Connor… [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:58 am by elemembers
Case reference: Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Ltd. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:58 am by elemembers
Case reference: Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Ltd. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 9:54 pm by Richard Frank
On the other side of the aisle will be British Petroleum and a handful of other corporate defendants associated with the largest offshore oil disaster in U.S. history: Transocean (the owner of the Deepwater Horizon oil platform), Halliburton (the company that poured the concrete that lined the well and malfunctioned), and Cameron International (the firm that manufactured the well’s blowout preventer, which didn’t in fact prevent the blowout). [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 7:24 am by Robert R.M. Verchick
The former geologist and yachting-enthusiast left BP inOctober 2010 and now works for Glencore International, a commodities company involved inhardrock mining. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:28 am
True, the fact that companies took the bait shows a tendency for illegal behavior, but that there was bait at all is a problem. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am by Michael Scutt
Last week the Supreme Court gave its Judgment in the case of Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Ltd and the answer may well now be that the reach of the ET has just got longer. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 1:45 am by Christopher Knight, 11 KBW.
This was the issue before the Supreme Court in Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Ltd [2012] UKSC 1. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:05 pm by Jeffrey Richardson
The huge Houston-based energy company Halliburton announced that it is giving up on the BlackBerry and moving to the iPhone, according to Toronto newspaper The Globe and Mail. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:50 am by Rosalind English
The Appellant is a UK company based near Aberdeen, which is one of about 70 subsidiary or associated companies of Halliburton Inc., a US corporation. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:24 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In the light of Lawson v Serco [2006] UKHL 3, the Court considered whether an employment tribunal had jurisdiction in relation to individuals resident in Great Britain and employed by a British company, but who travelled to and from home to work overseas. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am by Laura Sandwell
BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Akzo Nobel UK Ltd and Excess Insurance Company… [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 2:37 pm
NEW ORLEANS, LA - On Tuesday, January 31, 2012, a Federal Judge ruled in the civil case involving BP, Plc and Halliburton, the company that provided the cement that was supposed to seal off the Macondo well head in the Gulf Oil Spill disaster in April, 2010. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 10:57 am by Maritime Law Staff
NEW ORLEANS, LA – On Tuesday, January 31, 2012, a Federal Judge made a ruling in the civil case involving BP, Plc and Halliburton, the company that provided the cement that was supposed to seal off the Macondo well head in the Gulf Oil Spill disaster in April, 2010. [read post]