Search for: "HUGHES v. HUGHES" Results 401 - 420 of 3,071
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2023, 10:10 am by Chiara Gallo
 PatentsRose Hughes discussed the recent High Court decision (Newron v Comptroller [2023] EWHC 1471) in relation to the interpretation of the phrasing “the product” and its meaning within the SPC Regulation.Rose Hughes analysed the minutes of the oral processings confirming the Board of Appeal’s decision, in relation to case T 0116/18, to acknowledge the inventive step of a claimed invention. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
 ([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457), McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73), Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481), Donald v Ntuli ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) and, most recently, JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:55 am by INFORRM
The Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights today gave judgment in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom (Judgment of 10 May 2011). [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:39 pm by INFORRM
On 26 July 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat handed down a reserved judgment after the trial in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group ([2011] EWHC 1884 (QB)). [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 2:22 am by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC is the joint author of The Law of Human Rights, 2nd Edn, OUP, 2009, and an editor of Inforrm [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
 The Judge applied the approach which he took in Sloutsker v Romanova ([2015] EWHC 545 (QB) [22]-[23]). [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Accordingly, any interference with an artist’s right to such expression must be examined with particular care (see Vereinigung Bildender Künstler v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Reference was made to a number of cases, in particular, Global Torch Ltd v Apex Global Management Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 819. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The court referred to the six criteria established to balance Article 8 and Article 10, set out in the 2012 Grand Chamber case of Axel Springer v Germany. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:39 am by Dennis Crouch
But the only en banc petitions Hughes said he reads seriously are the precedential decisions, particularly with dissents. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 12:48 pm by ernst
Brown, political science professor at Auburn University who was the winner of the SCHS’s Hughes-Gossett Award in 2017. [read post]