Search for: "Handy v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 524
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2010, 7:07 am
Does anyone know of a handy compendium of what the standard of proof is in the various states here? [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
United States Cellular Corporation (N.D. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
"The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that the County was under no contractual obligation to provide [Handy] with health insurance and, accordingly, it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in terminating that benefit.The Handy decision should be contrasted with two other retiree benefits cases: Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady.The Schenectady cases differed in that they concerned executive action as opposed to… [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 9:18 am
Whittlestone Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:01 am
Again, the Delaware court filing includes a handy chart to illustrate the corporate relationship at this stage: The Tropicana Consolidation by AztarThe situation then becomes a little more convoluted. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 11:47 pm
” In Whittlestone v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:35 am
There's also a DomainNews newsletter, from which readers can gather tidbits of information they may find handy. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:11 pm
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm
Here's the plan: Part I: Introduction (today) Part II: Circuit Judges Part III: County Judges Part IV: School Board, District 6 Part V: Miami-Dade County Charter Amendments Incidentally, if you don't know where to vote use the handy precinct-finder. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 8:39 am
I just read Anders v California for the first time (ever, or in a long time) in preparation for writing this post. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 3:39 am
In State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 10:56 am
P&G v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm
The United States Supreme Court released its judgment in City Of Ontario, California, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:55 pm
To this end, the UK's Intellectual Property Office has posted this page on its website with some fresh links to model agreements and some handy guidance. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 12:40 pm
State v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 12:10 pm
State and federal officials have since launched “excessive force” inquiries. [read post]
30 May 2010, 11:55 am
Courts have already explained that wrongs under the Maryland Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act require a showing that someone's reasonable expectation of privacy has suffered violation (see Fearnow v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:42 am
He obtained the tenancy in 1997 on the basis of a homeless application, stating that he and his 18 month old son had been thrown out by his wife, with whom an elder child stayed. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:42 am
He obtained the tenancy in 1997 on the basis of a homeless application, stating that he and his 18 month old son had been thrown out by his wife, with whom an elder child stayed. [read post]
