Search for: "Harms v. IRS"
Results 401 - 420
of 427
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2009, 7:14 am
Per Jewell v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:36 pm
* * * * * Lawsuit of the Year Sarkozy v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 9:21 am
Estes v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 21, 2008 US v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 1:00 am
Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 7:07 am
IRS (07-802). [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 10:06 am
[4] Bank Julius Baer v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:40 am
USANA Health Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 3:11 am
In any event, their tax liability was not the subject of the negotiations with the IRS. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 3:11 am
In any event, their tax liability was not the subject of the negotiations with the IRS. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Sedore, No. 06-2259 "A sentence for conspiracy to defraud the IRS and identity theft is affirmed where: 1) for purposes of applying sentence enhancements, defendant did abuse a position of trust, and he waived an argument regarding the number of victims; and 2) the sentence was not substantively unreasonable. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:06 am
The general perception in the legal community has been that they are tax free, a dangerous and incorrect perception post Murphy v IRS and there was no shortage of settlement brokers angling to write these cases on the false promise that they could be done so income tax free and under the protective umbrella of section 104 and section 130. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:57 pm
Lightbourne v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 3:41 am
Per Murphy v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:41 am
The fact is, post Murphy v IRS your ability to take that position as a legal professional, or as a settlement professional, is built on a foundation of sand so it is far better to be proactive and really dig in to work out a solution to this issue. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 8:27 am
The action, U.S. v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 8:29 am
" Brummels v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 5:12 pm
IRS, which was handed down by the 11th Circuit in 1996. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
For wage and hour attorneys, Wednesday's hearing in Murphy v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
Yesterday, in Murphy v. [read post]
