Search for: "Holder v. Smith"
Results 401 - 420
of 500
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
The Federalists believed that the people were for them, but that the holders of state office would oppose them. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The court found that Third Circuit precedents, Hays and Co v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
Copyright needs a radical fix that embraces the digital world and pays as much attention to users and creators as to the economic and political interests which have so far been mostly favoured": Graham Smith (Bird & Bird LLP partner and Cyberleagle blogger). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 9:43 pm
How much so when it is more than a lion -- a Lionel, in fact -- and none other than Professor Lionel Bently, holder of the Herchel Smith chair in IP Law at the University of Cambridge, author, sage and lively commentator on a wide number of IP issues of which copyright is not the least significant. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:25 am
See Tzolis v Wolff, 10 NY3d 100, 108 (2008) (quoting Robinson v Smith, 3 Paige Ch. 222, 232–33 (NY Ch. 1832)). [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm
The petition relies on the 1980′s decision in Harper and Row v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
CORIOLAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
But the plan treats holders of insured and uninsured asbestos personal-injury claims differently. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:40 am
Stuart, 427 US 539 (1976), Smith v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
The test in Smith v Jones is discretionary. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:35 am
In this Christmas season children are eagerly awaiting prepackaged presents. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
Smith, 17-1348. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
The copyright holder sent a “takedown notice” to YouTube, which then removed the video. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am
Smith Corporation) on March 28, 2012 discussing the need to take reasonable measures to protect information that you wish to protect as a trade secret. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Preface… Before I jump into this decision by a U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 3:37 am
Bank v. [read post]
