Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 401 - 420
of 7,434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
London Borough of Waltham Forest v Saleh (2019) EWCA Civ 1944 The Court of Appeal on section 202 Housing Act 1996 reviews of suitability and what facts should be relevant at the time of review. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Gonzales v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
One real, one fake.That's incredibly close to this case. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:45 pm
That can be seen from, for example, the decision of the House of Lords in Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council (2001) UKHL 57, (2002) 1 AC 547 and, more recently, that of the Court of Appeal in Waltham Forest London Borough Council v Saleh. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
SHIREY V. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
Under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
A shotgun was found at defendant’s house. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 10:34 am
The closing date for responses is 6 November 2018. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:48 am
As a followup on the interrelationship of KSR v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
ComerToday's case brief is Anderson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:52 pm
In King v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:45 am
PPS, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 1:15 am
In R (West) v Parole Board [2005] 1 WLR 350 the House of Lords found that the recall of a prisoner (who had been released as of right after the custodial element of his sentence) for breach of his licence conditions did engage art 5(4). [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 11:54 am
” A.D. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 7:26 am
As against that, in Iperion Investments Corp. v Broadwalk House Residents Ltd [1995] 2 EGLR 47, the Court of Appeal did allow for the recovery of legal costs in a lease which did not necessarily contain such “clear and unambiguous” terms. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 7:26 am
As against that, in Iperion Investments Corp. v Broadwalk House Residents Ltd [1995] 2 EGLR 47, the Court of Appeal did allow for the recovery of legal costs in a lease which did not necessarily contain such “clear and unambiguous” terms. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 11:09 am
Case closed? [read post]
