Search for: "Howard Wasserman" Results 401 - 420 of 549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2018, 7:21 am by Amanda Frost
 As professor Howard Wasserman suggests, a better name might be “universal injunction,” because the debate is about whether injunctions can require the federal government to cease enforcing a law against nonparties, not whether the injunctions should apply nationwide. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am by Adam Chandler
Nicastro drew the attention of at least one commentator, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:04 am by Isaac Park
Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, echoing Justice Ginsburg’s dissent, argues that “[i]t makes no sense for a statute's private right of action not to be coextensive with the substantive law being applied”: Ginsburg is correct that there should be a link, not separation, between prohibited activities and authorized remedies. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:51 am by Amy Howe
”  Commentary on the ruling comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am by Amy Howe
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman cites “the limits of the judicial role” as a possible reason why the late Justice Thurgood Marshall is “never in the conversation about civil rights icon[s]. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Kiran Bhat
Kenneth Jost of Jost on Justice criticizes the book as “flawed,” while – commenting on a critical review of the book by Judge Richard Posner – Howard Wasserman of PrawfsBlawg notes that Justice Scalia may have avoided Judge Posner’s criticism by citing in his book to his “votes [that] have been ideologically unexpected while also arguably adhering to some form of originalism–the Confrontation Clause cases of the last decade, beginning with… [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, who remarks that although comments like Cruz’s may be “all posturing, in light of recent polls,” they do “hint that a lame-duck confirmation of Merrick Garland is not in the offing. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman analyzes the argument for this blog. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am by Conor McEvily
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman responds to a recent essay by Ronald Dworkin in the New York Review of Books on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
  Bill Mears reports on the summary reversal for CNN; Howard Wasserman weighs in at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman analyzes the argument for this blog. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
This blog’s preview came from Howard Wasserman. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman looks at Monday’s decision in Venezuela v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:23 am by Michael McCann
(from May 30, 2010), Howard Wasserman's Why is Steroids Use Considered Cheating (Oct. 10, 2006) and Greg Skidmore's Performance-Enhancing Surgery and Sports (April 21, 2005). [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am by Amy Howe
United States), and from Cassandra Robertson and Howard Wasserman in two posts at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary on Masterpiece Cakeshop comes from Jeff Milchen at The American Independent Business Alliance; Walter Olson in an op-ed for the New York Daily News; law student Justin Burnam at The Least Dangerous Blog; Mark Joseph Stern at Slate; David Boyle at Casetext; Jeffrey Toobin at The New Yorker’s Daily Comment blog; Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg; Douglas Laycock and Thomas Berg at Vox; the same authors in an op-ed for the New York Daily News, where… [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman wonders “whether the lack of interest in the scope of the injunction hints at where the Court will come down on the merits. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Nabiha Syed
” Also at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman looks at two cases that “together suggest a ‘retail’ approach to constitutional rights and civil enforcement of constitutional rights. [read post]