Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 401 - 420
of 547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2018, 7:21 am
As professor Howard Wasserman suggests, a better name might be “universal injunction,” because the debate is about whether injunctions can require the federal government to cease enforcing a law against nonparties, not whether the injunctions should apply nationwide. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 4:45 am
” Former Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean declared the identical position: “Hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:02 am
Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg picked up on Frank's video as well, and runs with it in a different direction altogether. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 3:46 pm
See also Howard Wasserman for more. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman responds to a recent essay by Ronald Dworkin in the New York Review of Books on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman reports on Monday’s order denying review in Scott v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am
” Additional commentary on Masterpiece Cakeshop comes from Jeff Milchen at The American Independent Business Alliance; Walter Olson in an op-ed for the New York Daily News; law student Justin Burnam at The Least Dangerous Blog; Mark Joseph Stern at Slate; David Boyle at Casetext; Jeffrey Toobin at The New Yorker’s Daily Comment blog; Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg; Douglas Laycock and Thomas Berg at Vox; the same authors in an op-ed for the New York Daily News, where… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 10:06 am
There's also been an interesting discussion on dual-academic couples (a topic close to the Glom heart), started by Jeffrey Harrison, and continued by Howard Wasserman, and Jennifer Hendricks. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
” Additional commentary comes from Hera Arsen at Ogletree Deakins and from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm
Daniel Fisher of Forbes summarizes Justice Scalia’s opinion for the Court, while Bloomberg’s Greg Stohr offers some background on the case and PrawfsBlawg’s Howard Wasserman praises the ruling’s clarification of “the jurisdiction/merits divide as to federal statutes. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:43 am
” Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, who remarks that although comments like Cruz’s may be “all posturing, in light of recent polls,” they do “hint that a lame-duck confirmation of Merrick Garland is not in the offing. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:46 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the argument for this blog. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am
The Federalist Society website also has an ongoing debate for scholars on the decision, with the latest commentary by law professors Larry Ribstein and Howard Wasserman. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 5:44 pm
(Eugene Volokh and Howard Wasserman explain the doctrine). [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
” Also at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman considers whether Congress could or should change how the Chief Justice is selected. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman looks at Monday’s decision in Venezuela v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:24 am
Howard Wasserman writes at Prawfs: A different issue--and possible future bomb--involves whether government has speech rights. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am
This blog’s preview came from Howard Wasserman. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:19 am
Lyle Denniston covered the decision for this blog; commentary on the decision comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, who contends that, although the unanimous opinion by Justice Ginsburg “[s]ounds simple enough, . . . inside the opinion is a lot of really bad stuff”; from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who argues that the decision is “important” because “[i]t further narrows the space for claiming First Amendment… [read post]
