Search for: "Hudson v. People" Results 401 - 420 of 603
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The conflict is not between princes and people, as it was in the 16th and 17th centuries, but between individual communicators and a multiplicity of laws… What is plainly required is an international agreement to govern communications on the web and, in particular, to determine whether they are to be regulated by an agreed set of supra-national regulations or, if not, to provide a generally acceptable means of deciding which domestic law should apply to any offending publication. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:26 am by Russ Bensing
  Scalia engage in a similar diatribe five years ago in Hudson v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:09 am by PaulKostro
BERNARD KENNY and THE HUDSON COUNTY DEMOCRATIC ORGANIZATION, INC. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 6:30 am
In striking down the entire statute, Judge Vinson diverged from Judge Hudson’s December 13, 2010 decision in Virginia v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 11:42 am by Andrew Koppelman
He acknowledges that there is no authority for this distinction, but quotes United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm by Gideon
: On a similar note, Rick Horowitz writes today about freedom and why that’s not what’s killing people. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:56 am by Jon
The Fourth Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by Charley
Hudson was the presiding judge for the lawsuit brought against the US Government by Virginia over a mandate requiring people to buy health insurance by 2014. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
District Judge Henry Hudson of the Eastern District of Virginia is the first jurist in the country to rule that Congress exceeded its constitutional authority in setting the minimum-coverage mandate. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 7:33 am by SOIssues
I am quoting from an opinion by Judge Hudson from a year ago, in United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 2:29 pm by Orin Kerr
For example, the category might be searches made in violation of the knock-and-announce rule (as in Hudson v. [read post]