Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF C. B., A CHILD"
Results 401 - 420
of 2,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2010, 10:40 am
a. $750,000 b. $500,000 c. $100,000 d. $0 Prior to the discovery of Bernard Madoff's $65 billion Ponzi scheme, few people gave much thought to SIPC. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:10 pm
A court of this state which is competent to decide child custody matters has jurisdiction to make a child custody determination by initial or modification decree only when: (a) this state (i) is the home state of the child at the time of commencement of the custody proceeding, or (ii) had been the child's home state within six months before commencement of such proceeding and the child is absent from this state because of his removal or retention by a… [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
Is that need the result of: a) there being no person who has parental responsibility. b) his being lost or abandoned c)the person caring for him being prevented from providing him with suitable accommodation or care. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 12:23 pm
C&M Door Controls, Inc., 200 N.J. 348, 356 (2009).] [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 7:28 pm
At the Law Office of John C. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
In addition to a “verified petition” showing “that the circumstances of the child or one or both parents or joint legal or physical custodians have materially and substantially changed since the entry of the order to be modified” and that the modification is in the child’s best interest, both parents must also have complied in good faith with an applicable dispute resolution procedure. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 3:50 pm
C-29, s. 3(1)(b));[2] · the declared parent may register the child in school; and, · the declared parent may assert her rights under various laws such as the Health Care Consent Act, 1996, S.O. 1996, c. 2, Sched. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
(b) Failure to maintain a reasonable degree of interest, concern or responsibility as to the child’s welfare. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:47 am
The problem, for Bowersox, is that § 1466A(b)(1) is not a possession of child pornography statute like the one at issue in Ashcroft. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am
The AIT had referred to the three most important ‘public interest’ factors to be considered in deportation cases per OH (Serbia) v SSHD, namely (a) the risk of re-offending, (b) the need for possible deportation to be seen as a means of deterrence, and (c) the role of using deportation orders as an expression of the public’s revulsion at serious crimes and the need to build public confidence in the treatment of foreign citizens who have committed… [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:38 pm
Proposal: clickthrough policies designed to educate the public, maybe choices. 1A shouldn’t be a barrier to regulation b/c the use for endorsement is commercial speech. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:35 pm
Stepparents and California Family Law: Issues and Pointers by Michael C. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:08 am
c) Holding: No. d) Rationale: First, the court reaffirmed that trial courts have broad discretion in cases related to child custody. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 9:45 pm
In this case, Melendez was: A) Convicted of statutory rape; B) Based upon conclusive DNA evidence proving he conceived this child, which was followed by: C) A voluntary confession, to hopefully avoid a jail sentence – which he did. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 9:45 pm
In this case, Melendez was: A) Convicted of statutory rape; B) Based upon conclusive DNA evidence proving he conceived this child, which was followed by: C) A voluntary confession, to hopefully avoid a jail sentence – which he did. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm
A Primer on Freedom Let’s begin our discussion with a review of the Ann Coulter affair, which bears some analogues to the Québéc niqab issue. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:51 am
” N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.46(b)(2). [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
My poster child: Gordon v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:38 am
(Risk of injury to child; "The defendant, Paul B., appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of two counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (2). [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 10:28 am
Furthermore, the court is likely to call in the accuser and the report-maker as witnesses to determine the best interest of the child(ren). [read post]
