Search for: "INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS"
Results 401 - 420
of 507
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Newegg (EDTexweblog.com) District Court Delaware: Plaintiff’s marking of packaging instead of products precludes pre-suit damages: Belden Technologies Inc. et al v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Maersk (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court S D Texas: Continuing use of accused products sold prior to notice of patent is not direct infringement sufficient to support claim of indirect infringement: Tesco v Weatherford (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Enhanced damages & attorney’s fees: Plaintiff awarded $5 million in fees, $3 million in expert expenses, and treble damages as a result of litigation misconduct by defendant: ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et al… [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Plaintiff opposed that cross motion, arguing that NYCTA was not entitled to summary judgment because the NYCTA is not in the business of renting or leasing motor vehicle, and thus not within the class to which the Graves Amendment applies and/or protects. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:23 am
It was improper to include in an indirect purchaser class plaintiffs whose claims arose in states that foreclosed indirect purchasers from recovering for price fixing or monopolization. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
Settlement discussions led to separate agreements for two plaintiff classes, one class for direct purchasers with federal law claims and one class for indirect purchasers with state law claims, for a total of $295 million. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
The natural result of those differences is that there can be no certification of a nationwide class of state indirect purchaser plaintiffs because there is no common question of law or material fact. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 4:20 am
It then reached a conclusion about differences in state law that, once again, sounds very familiar to mass tort and consumer class action lawyers: The natural result of all of those differences [in state laws] is that there can be no certification of a nationwide class of state indirect purchaser plaintiffs because there is no common question of law or material fact. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the settlement must be vacated because the lower court had improperly certified a nationwide class of indirect purchasers despite recognizing that some of those plaintiffs would be barred from pursuing such indirect claims under the laws of their own states. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:37 am
" Both lawsuits are seeking class-action status and treble damages. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:04 am
Wild Law Group PLLC is interim lead counsel for the indirect purchaser class. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:44 am
It is less obvious with respect to claims for direct or indirect economic losses. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:51 am
Court of Appeal’s earlier decision certifying a class of direct and indirect purchasers of DRAMs (semiconductor memory chips also known as “dynamic random access memory”) remains therefore the definitive pronouncement on the law on class certifications in competition cases in Canada. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 11:52 am
At the request of attorneys for the plaintiffs and would-be class representatives, Judge Mosman was requested to issue a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, which he did on May 24, 2010. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:00 am
The standing hurdle arises from the indirect nature of New Governance regulation, which raises questions under current doctrine about causation and redressability. [read post]
11 May 2010, 12:26 pm
Until the class is certified, the case is only between the named plaintiffs and the defendants. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm
Jan.27, 2009), in which the Court denied the plaintiff's request, made at the class certification hearing, to withdraw the pending class certification motion in order to substantively redefine the class and conduct additional discovery. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:47 pm
These are: (1) summary judgment, (2) Daubert/expert admissibility, (3) class certification, and (4) Twombly/Iqbal/Rule 8/12 motions to dismiss. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:20 pm
S., this was one of the first times that a Canadian court had certified a class of direct and indirect purchasers in an alleged price-fixing conspiracy case. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:18 pm
Feb. 22, 2010), the plaintiff had brought a putative class action under Washington's Consumer Protection Act, as well as a common law claim of unjust enrichment and a request for declaratory judgment. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:26 pm
Also rejected were (1) claims by all of the plaintiffs that the drug companies had attempted to monopolize the market for the generic version through an overall scheme that included improper patent listing in the Food and Drug Administration's Orange Book, the filing of sham litigation, and the reverse payment settlements and (2) claims by indirect purchasers that the defendants' actions violated the common law and antitrust laws of 40 states.Therefore, the… [read post]
