Search for: "In Interest of Jackson" Results 401 - 420 of 5,896
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Such history would reveal historical gaps, discrepancies, or unworkable puzzles, rather than only presenting sources favoring one party or the other’s self-interested aims. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
One of the most contentious items in the British Museum are the Benin Bronzes, which originated from the Kingdom of Benin, now located in the Federal Republic of Nigeria.[5] The Kingdom of Benin was established in the 1200s and grew into a prosperous and wealthy empire, well known for its craftsmen and trade network.[6] As a result, many artworks were created, from engraved ivory tusks to plaques.[7] Those artworks represented a visual archive of the Kingdom of Benin that were used in religious… [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Given Trump's well-known admiration for Jackson the populist/racist, it's not entirely surprising that Trump would emulate Jackson in treating federal government power as available to serve his own partisan and personal ends.To be sure, the spoils system punished enemies by stripping them of their jobs, not by prosecuting them. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:03 pm by Josh Blackman
Part I of his dissent, which Justices Jackson and Kagan did not join, warns about "existential threat to the continued vitality of Tribes. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:32 pm by Ronald Mann
It is almost impossible to imagine that Congress would grant tribes such a favored status, and the near-unanimity of the opinion shows how little interest the justices have in contorting straightforward language to reach such a counter-intuitive result. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:27 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the majority, in a 34-page opinion joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:23 am by Michael C. Dorf
Coughlin, the Court, in an opinion by Justice Jackson, ruled 8-1 that the bankruptcy code abrogates the sovereign immunity of Indian tribes. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:14 am by Sierra N. Hennessy
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Some of the elements of our test for "misconduct," however, describe some connection to the employer's interests by referencing disregard of the employer's interests or standards the employer can rightfully expect from the employee and either culpable negligence or substantial disregard with respect to the employer's interests or the employee's duties. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 4:45 am by jonathanturley
Below is my column in the New York Post on the Trump indictment and why so many citizens have little interest in its content or charges. [read post]
It is interesting, though, this inherent tension between the logical implications of Garmon, which Justice Jackson articulated very well, and the need for some kind of limited judicial examination of the arguably protected preemption test under Garmon itself. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 1:35 pm by Amy Howe
But court watchers interested in Thomas’ disclosures for 2022 will have to wait. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:29 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
“On the other hand, the law serves moral and health interests of some (disputable) magnitude for in-state residents. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 As to the penalty, Judge Casey opined "An appropriate penalty should take into consideration petitioner’s interest in ensuring that all of its employees strictly comply with its firearm regulations as well as principles of progressive discipline, the facts of [the] case, and [the] respondent’s background. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 As to the penalty, Judge Casey opined "An appropriate penalty should take into consideration petitioner’s interest in ensuring that all of its employees strictly comply with its firearm regulations as well as principles of progressive discipline, the facts of [the] case, and [the] respondent’s background. [read post]