Search for: "In Re: C.A." Results 401 - 420 of 1,434
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
., upholding the C.A. decision to enter a guilty verdict for sexual assault; remitted to trial court for sentencing. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Binet, 2019 QCCA 669Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), Québec, 200-10-003590-184Décision de : Juges Louis Rochette, Julie Dutil et Robert M. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Ministre de la Justice du Canada, 2019 QCCA 683Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), Montréal, 500-10-006232-167Décision de : Juges Geneviève Marcotte, Marie-Josée Hogue et Jocelyn F. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Commission des normes, de l’équité, de la santé et de la sécurité du travail, 2019 QCCA 609Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), Québec, 200-09-009447-175Décision de : Juges Guy Gagnon, Manon Savard et Claude C. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
Lopehandia, (2004) 71 OR (3d) 416 (C.A.), the Ontario Court of Appeal granted a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from disseminating, posting on the Internet or publishing further defamatory statements concerning Barrick or its officers, directors or employees. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 3:59 am by Administrator
., 2019 QCCA 460Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), Montréal, 500-10-006323-164 et 500-10-006325-169Décision de : Juges Nicole Duval Hesler (juge en chef), Allan R. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 3:59 am by Administrator
Il s’est désisté de sa première plainte. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
À la lumière de l’arrêt Colombie-Britannique (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) c. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Conseil québécois sur le tabac et la santé, 2019 QCCA 358Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), Montréal, 500-09-025385-154 et autresDécision de : Juges Yves-Marie Morissette, Allan R. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 3:58 am by Administrator
Bussières, 2019 QCCA 280Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), Québec, 200-09-009573-178Décision de :  Juges Allan R. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[71] Justice Arbour noted that, in explaining the standard to a jury, it might be preferable to re-word the standard of causation using positive terms, for example, a phrase such as a “‘significant contributing cause’ rather than using expressions phrased in the negative such as ‘not a trivial cause’ or ‘not insignificant’. [read post]