Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges" Results 401 - 420 of 9,776
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm by Ronald Mann
So wouldn’t putting these decisionmakers even closer to the political body only exacerbate the problem that you’re complaining of? [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 1:37 pm by Dirk Auer
It is using brute (regulatory) force to (re)litigate old competition cases. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:38 am by Andrew Russell
Jan. 7, 2011), Chief Judge Bartle, sitting by designation from the District of New Jersey, issued a memorandum opinion addressing several invalidity issues raised during a three-day bench trial, including inequitable conduct, anticipation, and obviousness-type double patenting. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by John L. Welch
" In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate, ___ USPQ2d ___, Serial No. 77099522 (TTAB 2011), quoting In re Pacer Tech., 338 F.3d 1348, 67 USPQ2d 1629, 1631 (Fed. [read post]
13 May 2015, 11:21 am by Andy
If copying had occurred, there were several points in the process at which this could have occurred: in Ms Adams’s original Twiggy design, in the later re-worked Twiggy designs, or after Ms Adams had left the company when the Twiggy design was modified under the direction of Mr Bagga to become the Red Blossom design. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:44 am by Andy
If copying had occurred, there were several points in the process at which this could have occurred: in Ms Adams’s original Twiggy design, in the later re-worked Twiggy designs, or after Ms Adams had left the company when the Twiggy design was modified under the direction of Mr Bagga to become the Red Blossom design. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:44 am by John C. Manoog III
According to the district court judge, the proposed amended complaint, while “more fulsome,” still failed to state a claim for relief. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 10:27 am by CJ Haddick
” Chief Judge Land also denied the motion to dismiss the unjust enrichment claim, writing that he would re-visit the issue at summary judgment. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 5:58 am by Above the Law
First federal judges explain history to historians, now they're explaining neurology to neurologists. [read post]
16 May 2022, 3:27 am
In re Daniel Novela, Serial No. 90134566 (May 10, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Melanye K. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 3:54 am
In re Puma SE, Serial No. 90600590 (August 29, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher C. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 3:35 am
In re James Lindsay, Serial No. 90793706 (January 8, 2034) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:23 am
In re Marshfield Consulting LLC, Serial No. 88099557 (May 19, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin). [read post]
17 May 2018, 3:27 am
In re Henson, Serial No. 87130461 (May 14, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 2:44 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of LONE STAR PEDIATRIC DENTAL & BRACES and Design (shown below) for dental services, in view of the registered mark LONE STAR for "medical services"].In re RSRK Inc, Serial No. 86806911 and 86806949 (September 13, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw). [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 3:29 am
 In re Viromare Design LLC, Serial No. 87705193 (February 19, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:26 am
In re Sunrise Apparel Group, LLC, Serial No. 88571635 (February 18, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David K. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 3:27 am
[Answer in first comment].In re Norková, Serial No. 79199465 (September 28, 2018)  [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin). [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:46 am
"] In re DRiV Automotive, Inc., Serial No. 87720124 (August 24, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]