Search for: "In Re Adoption of Children by F." Results 401 - 420 of 452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2007, 1:31 pm
BSA's own internal "Ineligible Volunteer Files" (also called "the confidential records"), records it collected and maintained in secrecy for seventy years, reveal that scouting is a pedophile "magnet" and that removed pedophiles were often able to re-enter scouting in other locations. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
Last week I presented a paper for Australia's CEO Challenge about same sex domestic violence. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 9:39 am by Patricia Hughes
It involves re-conceiving processes through multi-disciplinary collaboration, visualisation and a whole range of techniques that help to bring to bear new approaches to old problems. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
After graduating from Penn in 1988, Strine clerked for John F. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:43 am by Eugene Volokh
["The gravity of the privacy concerns in this [case] is further underscored by the [amicus briefs supporting the challenge].... [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by Adam Thierer
 For example, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s 2010 budget is just $400 million.[2] While many look to CPB to fund children’s programming (among its many other activities), its entire budget is no more than a quarter of the total amount of U.S. advertising revenue produced by children’s programming from food and beverages products alone: $1.6 billion in 2006 by the FTC’s most conservative estimates.[3] That comparison illustrates the vital… [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
This essay is not a normative argument in defense of deference, but rather an account of how the District Court in Texas boldly—and without discussion or acknowledgment—did away with such deference in ordering the Biden administration to re-start MPP, and how the Supreme Court, in refusing to stay the injunction, seemed not to mind. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am by CMS
Second is that the Lord Advocate’s interpretation of Sch 6 para 1(f) by-passes/undermines this. [read post]
8 May 2017, 8:20 am
’ In March 2011, a panel of the Parole Board found that J.I. had violated the conditions of his supervised release by having “an Internet capable device in his possession” and by his earlier `accessing pornography and images of nude children. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that this exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
In In re the Estate of Johnny Vajgrt, Bill Ernst, Inc., Intervenor (IA Sup. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Practice Under Michigan Court Rules of 1985 As the Michigan Court Rules of 1985 were promulgated after the adoption of the UCPA, the Michigan Supreme Court recognized the UCPA’s effect expressly excluded from the Court Rules the GCR provisions regarding condemnation cases. [read post]
14 May 2010, 12:07 am by Michael Geist
  It matters because I am a parent whose children have only known life with the Internet and I want to ensure that they experience all the digital world has to offer. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:31 am
  It matters because I am a parent whose children have only known life with the Internet and I want to ensure that they experience all the digital world has to offer. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But only one ad said “all proceeds,” and the evidence demonstrated that the Mint gave $1.5 million to the Great Ormond Street Children’s Hospital and interpleaded another $2.5 million for charity upon the resolution of the lawsuit. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:29 pm by David Doniger
”  Now more than ever, we need legislation that puts Americans back to work, reduces our dependence on oil, cuts carbon pollution, and creates a healthier future for our children. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am by Hadley Baker, Mikhaila Fogel
Earlier that day, candidate Trump made public statements that included the following: ‘Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]