Search for: "In Re Brady" Results 401 - 420 of 1,159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2015, 9:34 am by Steve Baird
I’m presenting again with two very capable TTAB practitioners: Linda McLeod of Kelly IP in Washington, D.C., and Jonathan Hudis of Quarles & Brady’s D.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:55 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  And I guess a more articulate way of thinking about it is that Brady v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:49 am by SHG
  They’re doing for some rich guy in a white collar case. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 12:05 pm by Sean Hanover
Almost never wins -- but, sometimes, you're right! [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 2:05 pm by Joe Patrice
[Hsu Untied] * NFL deflates Tom Brady's hopes of playing a full season. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
What progress has been made on gun law reform in state legislatures this year? [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
But the questions must be sufficiently specific and detailed to avoid the mantra, “We’re aware of our Brady obligations and we’ve met them. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:19 am by SHG
The district judge, who had trusted the AUSA, was so taken aback with the revelation that he barred further re-prosecution of the defendants as a sanction for the government’s misconduct. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
The defense and the defendant have no idea whether Brady material exists. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:39 am
After we vacated the conviction and gave Arizona a chance to re-try Milke, the Arizona Court of Appeals barred any re-trial in an opinion so scathing it made the New York Times. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
Judge Alex Kozinski -- for whom I clerked 20 years ago, who is one of our nation's most prominent appellate judges and who has long been seen as on balance a libertarianish conservative (appointed by President Reagan) -- has recently published an article in the Georgetown Law Journal that says some pretty harsh things about our criminal justice system, and offers some (doubtless controversial) proposals for improving it. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 9:07 am by Gritsforbreakfast
(In that case, the grounds would be Brady, probably not the junk science writ, so perhaps that case wouldn't get referred; I mention it because it shows how the scope of forensic error can mushroom as one analyst may handle many cases.) [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:56 am by Josh Blackman
United States, which involved the constitutionality of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, on June 17, 1996. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:20 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Jail phone calls and the Michael Morton Act If a jail records all inmate phone calls are prosecutors required to vet them for Brady material under the Michael Morton Act? [read post]