Search for: "In Re Christopher C."
Results 401 - 420
of 664
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
CHRISTOPHER STAPLES, Respondent. 1st District.Attorney's fees -- Appellate -- Trial court did not abuse discretion in using a fee multiplier of 1.5 in awarding appellate attorney's fees where the court had determined that a multiplier of 1.5 was appropriate in awarding trial court attorney's fees -- Claim that prevailing party attorney's fees provision in sections 175.061(5) and 185.05(5), Florida Statutes did not apply to a local government pension fund established pursuant to special law… [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:29 pm
Day, JudgeRepresenting Appellant Terry Smith: Christopher S. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 7:18 am
Justice C. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm
But whilst sympathetic on a human level I do think they’re wrong. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 1:15 pm
Christopher Guith, vice president of policy at the U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:11 pm
[4]47 USC § 230(c)(2)(A) [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
If you’re short on time, start with these posts. [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:59 am
The article reviews a judgment of the European Court of Justice (First Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (C-170/11), dealing with the mandatory or non-mandatory character of the European Evidence Regulation. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
Fleming, Rebecca C. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 5:38 am
This is part II of our series consisting of a law school paper by Daniel Reiter on the legal issues involved in sourcing product from China. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 1:11 pm
Not in the case of In re: James Christopher Haney, Case no: 10-10258-SSM (EDVA, Aug. 2010), where the bankruptcy judge for the Eastern District of Virginia ruled that the chapter 13 case had not been filed in bad faith. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 4:09 pm
(A slight aside – for an example of a child snatching myth busted, see the judgment of Cobb J reported this week in LM (A Child), Re [2013] EWHC 646 (Fam) wherein the notion that catching a ferry to Ireland before delivery of a baby will avoid the child protection process.) [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 5:24 am
No less than Christopher Hitchens indulged in the assumptions and premises of this discourse, thereby precluding a full appreciation of the fact that, “especially in the areas of public health, housing and education, [Chávez] succeeded in improving the standard of living of tens of millions of Venezuelans,”[6] or that his “government reduced extreme poverty by 70 percent,”[7] or that (while not entirely successful) imaginative and courageous experiments were… [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:59 am
Christoph Thole argues the judgment to be feasible, however, the ruling must not be generalized too easily. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
That is what happened to Christopher Robin who re-granted rights to Winnie-the-Pooh to Disney in 1983. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
That is what happened to Christopher Robin who re-granted rights to Winnie-the-Pooh to Disney in 1983. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
That is what happened to Christopher Robin who re-granted rights to Winnie-the-Pooh to Disney in 1983. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
If you invoke your termination right, and re-grant rights, you may have to live with that second deal. [read post]
