Search for: "In Re Goldstein"
Results 401 - 420
of 845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 am
Briefly: Richard Re of Re’s Judicata has the second part of his discussion of the relationship between circuit precedent and qualified immunity in the wake of last week’s summary reversal in Carroll v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:23 am
Briefly: At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re notes that “a significant chunk of the briefing” in Heien v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the relationship between circuit precedent and qualified immunity in the wake of last week’s summary reversal in Carroll v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:56 am
” We’re back on a daily schedule for the round-up. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:55 pm
" Stephen Goldstein, a spokesman for Johns Hopkins, said he wasn't aware of the censorship, and couldn't immediately comment. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:05 am
Briefly: At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the process by which the Court announces its opinions – a process, he suggests, that “help[s] to define the Court’s distinctive institutional role. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:13 pm
Two weeks ago it was 27, and now we're at 28 with the debut of the firm's Construction Law Blog, authored by Samuel Cortes, Julie Goldstein and Seth Niederman. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:46 am
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re examines the Court’s treatment, in Burwell v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 4:29 am
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the concept of third-party standing after the Court’s decision last Term in Lexmark International v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
—they’re all just tools. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm
We’re now past Memorial Day, and almost into June, so we are in the home stretch of October 2018 term. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 7:18 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm
We’re entering the home stretch for opinions, and after a relatively sleepy couple of opinion days last week, anticipation is ramping up. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:27 am
(Of course, if you’re going to work as a public defender, the D.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
” These are not technically relists, but they’re worth brief comment anyway. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:21 am
DO make sure you're covered. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 12:17 pm
Wrote Goldstein, "The government probably conducts fifty times as many warrantless searches a day as warrant-based searches. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
