Search for: "In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2019, 10:05 am
As the impeachment inquiry struggled to gain traction, the Watergate Special Prosecution Force investigation was well along. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:30 am
Judge Joan Lenard weighed both the claimant’s argumentsand the government’s objection, which inc [read post]
19 Sep 2006, 9:59 am
The case is Inquiry Concerning a Judge (Florida Supreme Court SC 05-2228) (July 13, 2006), 2006 WL 1911389. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 5:01 am
Judges additionally have significant discretion to manage qualified immunity litigation practice in their courts and can do so in ways that address some of the concerns I have raised. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:45 pm
At least in assessing whether the consumer is eligible for bankruptcy, it makes the inquiry really easy, because if you’re unemployed, obviously you should qualify at least on the basis of looking at your income. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 11:06 am
Could there be any clearer a reason why this nation must move forward with an independent commission of inquiry? [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:34 pm
In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943, 956 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 3:47 am
And yet, Judge Mehta put the SEC’s inchoate claim of “we’re just asking questions” ahead of a law firm’s fundamental ethical duty to its clients. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 2:36 am
Instead, the Governor appoints a crony who shuts down the inquiry so he can play hero to the pro-death penalty crowd in the run up to the primary. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:40 am
Celebrezze, Jr. and joined by Judges Eileen A. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:54 am
The report shall contain the information developed by counsel’s inquiry; [and] shall make recommendations concerning the court’s determination on the issue of incapacity. . . . [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
This week the Appellate Division, First Department (In re Develop Don't Destroy (Brooklyn) v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
This week the Appellate Division, First Department (In re Develop Don't Destroy (Brooklyn) v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 8:00 am
For this blog entry, our inquiry is focused on cases involving actual injuries or fatalities. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 5:30 pm
Thank you, Judge Freedman!] [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
IV, § 4.But what do concerns about consequences have to do with the LAW? [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 11:43 am
Her comment, and the unanimous decision invalidating gene patents, clearly expressed the court's concern that the Patent Office is overstepping its authority by approving patents that thwart, rather than foster, scientific inquiry and progress. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 1:02 pm
That was the question concerning whether one is a journalist or non-journalist, asked without reference to what one might be other than a journalist in that instance, which, the New Jersey court ruled, is not the inquiry — despite the insistence of another party, in that case a prosecutor, that the blogger is just “playing journalism” to avoid getting in trouble with the law: Union County prosecutor Theodore Romankow . . . [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 7:30 am
Even if every Federal Circuit § 1404(a) mandamus decision were treated as binding precedent, the fact-intensive and case-specific nature of the § 1404(a) inquiry arguably permits a judge (whether a district judge or a Federal Circuit judge deciding a mandamus petition) to justify almost any outcome in a given case. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Normally when we talk about consumer protection we’re concerned w/ a particular category of consumers regarded as vulnerable: lack the same level of info as businesses in the marketplace. [read post]
