Search for: "In Re Sears" Results 401 - 420 of 678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2011, 3:19 pm by David Lat
Oh yeah, I remember now — I reviewed a bunch of her emails as part of a doc review, back when she was at Sears and I was at a law firm.#34 – J. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:07 pm by David Lat
Sometimes it seems that, after you make partner at a top firm, you’re supposed to act superhuman in front of subordinates. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 3:25 pm by Glenn Reynolds
The president of the AZ police union also called up every Republican candidate and elected official in the state telling them ‘you’re fucked’ if you don’t condemn Brian Miller. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:35 am by Craig R. Hersch
We seared it all in the wok and served it to her two older sisters – who are finicky eaters. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm by Ken
This week, Jacob Sullum at Reason has a searing piece on sex offender laws demonstrating how categorical thinking about “sex offenders” has led to infuriating, ridiculous, unjust results. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:52 am by Russell Cawyer
And of course, the EEOC reached a $6.2M settlement with Sears over its use of a maximum leave policy. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sears/Compco is (1), Bonito Boats is (2)—recharacterizes Sears/Compco to say that as long as there’s a functionality defense and a secondary meaning requirement, preventing access to the feature is fine. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 1:02 pm
While you're there, pick up a few books for yourself and enjoy the quiet...while it lasts! [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:12 am by othernations
In a lot of ways, they’re a lot like us. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:54 am by Shawn Nevers
Sears Foreign and International Law Directory - Professor Dennis Sears has put together this directory to provide access to free legal resources for the countries of the world. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:59 am by Sean Wajert
Ordinarily the ability to plead res judicata or collateral estoppel gives a litigant adequate protection against being harassed by repetitive litigation by the loser in a previous suit against him. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 7:15 pm
See In re Seaborg, 328 F.2d 996 (CCPA 1964). [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 10:13 am by Alexa Silverman
  Now they’re all the rage in the courtroom. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542,1548 (Fed. [read post]