Search for: "In re: Eric F." Results 401 - 420 of 462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2020, 10:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Faced with challenging questions from the Justices about the formal-title rule, he stated that that "we wouldn't rely solely on titles" and that "[f]unction should be part of the analysis to make sure that you're not disadvantaging minority religions" (56, 80). [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:18 am by Eric Goldman
” To the extent that an automated filtering algorithm is itself information, defendants of course created it; what is also apparent from Prager’s pleaded facts, however, is that defendants have not “provided [it] through the Internet or any other interactive computer service” within the meaning of section 230(f)(3), to Prager or anyone else… Prager cites no authority for the proposition that algorithmic restriction of user content—squarely within the… [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 6:13 am
Five days later she received the DMCA Takedown Complaint courtesy of the NFL and YouTube.If you're an RSS fan don't miss Justia Federal Court Filings which allows you to see new filings by state, court or subject matter. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:54 am
The Wall Street Journal’s January 24, 2009 Heard on the Street column (here) notes balance sheet concerns involving reinsurer Swiss Re. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:32 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Along with that case, this is another one that is worth closely watching for sharing economy participants. __ Eric’s Comments: * Outmoded Laws. [read post]
21 May 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Susan Collins’s 2020 re-election campaign, according to a search warrant application. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:03 pm by Daniel B. Cohen
The latter came from research by Eric Brown of FDA’s CFSAN (Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition) division (6). [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
 Don’t you want them to have some idea what you’re talking about? [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Thank you Thomas [Kim] for that lovely introduction and I’m very pleased to be here at the Securities Regulation Institute giving the Alan B. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
In an earlier proceeding, the Board found that the Respondent unlawfully refused to hire certain union-affiliated applicants, and ordered the Respondent to provide instatement and backpay to the discriminatees. 333 NLRB 427 (2001), enfd. 332 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2003). [read post]
13 May 2013, 5:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  “[I]f Armstrong considered itself a seller of ‘general steel’ buildings, it would not have issued advertisements instructing consumers not to buy ‘general steel,’” but instead used the term to catch potential customers’ attention. [read post]