Search for: "In re HARPER"
Results 401 - 420
of 925
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2014, 2:07 pm
Harper’s take on the same Op-Ed. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:22 am
The Senate and the President had agreed only a few years earlier to the so-called “Biden Condition”(adopted after former Legal Adviser Abraham Sofaer’s alleged “re-interpretation” of the ABM Treaty), which provided that the Executive branch may not, acting alone, adopt a new interpretation of a treaty. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:52 am
I mean, they’re just going to go and head and do something anyway," Allan Hutchinson, a professor at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto, tells Legal Feeds.The government, operating on the advice of two former Supreme Court justices, had appointed Nadon in October to fill one of three seats reserved for Quebec, but Toronto lawyer Rocco Galati challenged the move. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am
You know, for a judge who loves the First Amendment and free speech so much when it comes to the right of publicity and nominative fair use, Judge Kozinski can seem oddly unconcerned about it in other areas of IP, like dilution, secondary liability, and, here, copyright. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 3:33 am
It wasn't "The Higher Yearning: Bringing Eros Back to Academe," a 2001 Harper's article written by a woman (Cristina Nehring). [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 12:20 pm
Harper, 96 N.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
Duell OK, now that you’re warmed up, no more softballs. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 12:59 pm
Show Notes About the Hosts Jonathan Bailey Jonathan Bailey (@plagiarismtoday) is the Webmaster and author of Plagiarism Today (Hint: You’re there now) and works as a copyright and plagiarism consultant. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:28 am
We now have the means and motive to re-design how we work to a degree unprecedented in the profession’s history. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 11:31 am
Something tells me that when you’re knee-deep in litigation over a few virtual islands, the answer is no. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 4:14 pm
What was first medicine was then criminalized, before being re-legalized for medical purposes at the state level in many states (including Michigan), and has now been decriminalized for recreational purposes in Colorado, Washington, and many Michigan cities. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am
The Supreme Court a few weeks ago agreed to review the Second Circuit’s decision in ABC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:31 pm
Movie Therapy for Law Students by Sonia Buck is, how shall I put it, one of the more niche titles that you’re likely to come across. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:56 am
News & World Report] * Playboy is suing Harper’s Bazaar for using its pictures of Kate Moss without permission. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 11:28 am
We’re transitioning to a new blog at The Washington Post. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 10:38 am
Harper Thanks to Steven for his thoughtful response. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:16 am
” See In re Citigroup Global Mkts., 258 S.W.3d 623, 625 (Tex. 2008)(orig. proceeding)(quoting Perry Homes, 258 S.W.3d at 597). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:20 am
Not so much if you’re an employee, since real wages are falling behind and the middle class is being hammered. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age Moderator: Karyn Temple Claggett, Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Policy & International Affairs, United States Copyright Office Previous Copyright Office study concluded that first sale only covers distribution and thus doesn’t apply in digital context where reproductions are involved. [read post]
