Search for: "In re Knight" Results 401 - 420 of 1,281
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2011, 5:23 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Yeganeh v Zurich Plc & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 398 (11 April 2011) Ambrosiadou v Coward [2011] EWCA Civ 409 (12 April 2011) Murphy v Wyatt [2011] EWCA Civ 408 (12 April 2011) Stanley & Anor v Rawlinson & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 405 (12 April 2011) Knight Frank LLP v Du Haney [2011] EWCA Civ 404 (12 April 2011) Revenue & Customs v Mayes [2011] EWCA Civ 407 (12 April 2011) Stanley & Anor v Rawlinson & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 406 (12 April… [read post]
27 May 2009, 9:41 am
You can read the letter here (courtesy of Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento).I'm opposed to the bill in its entirety -- I'm one of those who, as their letter puts it, "maintain that uniform restrictions on the use of deaccessioning proceeds may not neccessarily serve the best interest of the institutions or the public" -- like Christopher Knight, I think we can "trust [our] tax-subsidized museum professionals to use their art collections wisely and… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:10 pm
David Donoghue of Holland & Knight, and author... [read post]
31 May 2010, 5:51 am by Steve McConnell
(We'll be rooting for the Mountaineers the next time they take on the Scarlet Knights.) [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 9:30 am by Russell Knight
” 20 CFR § 222.22 So, the divorced spouse will have to be single (not re-married) and have been married for at least 10 years. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:09 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/510(a-5) In order to establish a substantial change in circumstances for the purpose of modifying maintenance “either the needs of the spouse receiving maintenance or the ability of the other spouse to pay that maintenance has changed” In re Marriage of Anderson, 409 Ill. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:36 am by Russell Knight
But, if your speech is hurting someone and it’s false…you’re committing defamation. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 11:37 am by Russell Knight
That means that if you’re asking the court to not follow guidelines, you must give the court a reason. [read post]