Search for: "In re Robert S." Results 401 - 420 of 14,752
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Ronald Mann
Roberts asked a long series of respectful hypotheticals trying to probe the logic and limits of the government’s argument. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
However, by marked contrast with the executive officials in Free Enterprise Fund, that's because they're adjudicators, for whom insulation from executive supervision is designed to ensure fairness and impartiality. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:56 am by Santiago Stocker
In contrast, during Nigeria’s 1999 transition election from military rule following the death of General Sani Abacha, and Zimbabwe’s 2018 transition election following the coup that ousted President Robert Mugabe, international observers noted widespread and significant irregularities in both cases. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:49 am by Eugene Volokh
And the court distinguished In re Adoption of Ridenour (Ohio 1991), which held that: … R.C. 3107.15 reflects the legislature's intent to find families for children. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm by Stephen Halbrook
"  Reflecting Rahimi's own actions, Roberts replied: "Well, it means someone who's shooting … at people. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am by Eric Goldman
In Brunetti, however, Justices Roberts, Breyer, and Sotomayor noted in opinions that concurred in part and dissented in part that Erik Brunetti could still display his proposed “FUCT” mark on clothing without a registration. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 8:45 am by sim1koh2
I have, and will always recommend Shimon & his law firm for their accountability, their desire to make you feel like you’re heard/personable, attention to detail and respectable reputation! [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
" Presumably he will attempt to run as a candidate for "No Labels," which wasted no time in praising Manchin as a great leader.It's easy to see why the likes of Manchin, Robert F. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 2:57 am by SHG
While they’re vague about how much of a payment a justice can pocket, there must of necessity be some latitude since one never knows what his mother’s house will cost or how large the money for winning a billionaire’s “prize” will be. [read post]