Search for: "In re S. H." Results 401 - 420 of 9,856
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
 Pix Credit here The issue of national security has become an important element of the re-ordering of apex powers as they continue to decouple their economies and set up their own post-global imperiums. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:05 pm by Nabil Shaikh
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In an article in the New York University Law Review, Gregory H. [read post]
10 May 2023, 12:35 pm by Sean Harrington
  Corporate Law  The Corporation as Technology: Re-calibrating Corporate Governance for A Sustainable Future / Bruner, Christopher M. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
The constitutional crisis caused by the Republicans’ attempts at extortion via the debt ceiling has now increased from a simmer to a boil. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:01 am by Peter Mahler
Second, there’s the appraisal proceeding under BCL § 623 triggered by a shareholder’s, LLC member’s, or limited partner’s dissent from a merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all the firm’s assets. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
”[9] While Utah’s state treasurer, who has decried ESG investing as part of “Satan’s plan,”[10]admits that “financially material ESG factors are already part of investment analysis,”[11]most commentators who hold the anti-ESG position don’t often allow for the mere existence of “risk-return ESG investing. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
With that quick “well, obviously, we’ll respond if we’re able” dismissal out of the way, the rest of the letter is an attempt to explain why the dean’s decisions are within her power. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 7:14 am
[Results in first comment].In re Valhalla Spirits, LLC, Serial No. 90729792 (April 12, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Robert H. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 1:45 pm by Shane McCall
The rule at 12 C.F.R. 121.103(h) will now clearly state: “a joint venture may be issued an order under a previously awarded contract beyond the two-year period. [read post]