Search for: "In re Steven C."
Results 401 - 420
of 1,005
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
Ashutosh Bhagwat, Richard Garnett, Andrew Koppelman, Seth Kreimer, Lawrence Lessig, Sanford Levinson, Robert O’Neil, David Post, Lawrence Sager, Seana Shiffrin, Steven Shiffrin, Geoffrey Stone, Nadine Strossen, William Van Alstyne and James Weinstein. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
§ 78u-5(c). [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm
Right now, there is a 4-4 split between Justices for and against Citizens United, if one assumes Justice Kagan (who replaced Justice Stevens) would vote to overturn it. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 6:46 am
Stevens referred Mr. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:01 am
(In re Stevens, (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 1228, 1234.)In re C.G., supra.But the Court of Appeals was not persuaded. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
., C. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
After attending the PLUS D&O Symposium some years ago, several colleagues at Partner Re thought it might be worthwhile to provide D&O insurance professionals with historical overview of the evolution of Directors and Officers insurance (D&O) in the US marketplace. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 6:25 pm
As was stated in Re P(DM) v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
Rueda argues that because the unsigned opinion of Judge Davidson was his first decision, he could not re-determine the merits in a subsequently signed decision. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:59 am
In In re Ebix, Inc. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:59 am
In In re Ebix, Inc. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 6:08 pm
Brookline Police Chief Daniel C. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 6:47 am
Do you think you’re depressed, sir? [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
Michael C. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm
Miln, 36 U.S. 102, 136 (1837) and The Passenger Cases, 48 U.S. 283, 474 (1849) (Taney, C. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
The case of Steven Truscott illustrates two of the main issues with the current review process. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:34 pm
Hoffmeister, Mark C. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
” That truly does sound serious and seems to vindicate the title of the Washington Post story: You’re worried about Trump? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
And finally Eleonora updated on the CJEU's decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment where the CJEU said that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive, but Member States can protect them: "[The Information Society] [D]irective provides that broadcasting organizations may prohibit the provision to the public fixations of their broadcasts [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
Throughout 2015, Seyfarth Shaw’s dedicated Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes Practice Group hosted a series of CLE webinars that addressed significant issues facing clients today in this important and ever-changing area of law. [read post]
