Search for: "In re TM"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
Commercial use doesn’t mean that we’re at commercial speech. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
They’re all expressive. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:10 am
Antitrust; TM also familiar. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:31 pm
Au-tomotive Gold: keychains made from car symbols aren’t being used as TM, D says, we’re using it ornamentally—court can’t wrap its head around that idea. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
So we’re back to the freedom from/freedom to divide. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:31 am
Patent students tend to be gobsmacked by abstraction and ambiguity of © and TM. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
We’re in court fighting for a band’s right to pick its own name. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm
We assume they’re equally serious across the board, but maybe not. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:17 pm
Peggy Radin: Rhetorical capture—the word cybersquatting was invented; took an asset that was unknown and allocated it to TM owners as soon as it was “born. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:31 am
Distinction between reactive and proactive functions of TM law. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 8:17 am
Trade dress: we don’t require registration to get TM rights. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:25 am
DonâEUR(TM)t [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:29 am
Well, in addition to being just plain wrong, the anonymous users' tweets included screenshots of Langton's tweets — including the poster's browser tabs: Today, friends, we're learning how to take a screenshot and the basics of computer crime laws from PBS. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Particularly if you're selling illicit goods. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:55 pm
The good news is that when the cartilage is re-approximated following the injury, the cosmetic outcome is improved. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
The IPKat weblog's theatre correspondent Eleonora reviews divergent sentiments concerning the need of mobile device owners to record what they're watching rather than take the trouble to experience it first-hand. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 3:57 am
On July 30, the Board re-designated as precedential (here) its decision in In re Graystone Consulting Associates, Inc., Serial No. 85913509 (May 12, 2015), affirming a refusal to register the mark WALK-IN SHOPPER for "business training consultancy services" on the ground that the specimen of use (shown below) failed to show use of the mark in connection with the identified services. click on image for larger pictureThe Board observed that "[a] service mark must be… [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:45 am
* We’re still waiting for some help with lookalike brands, Baroness! [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am
Abraham Drassinower & Jessica Silbey: if all you’re about is incentives, then there’s really just one entity, TM/©/patent/IP. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:03 am
They’re just different aspects. [read post]