Search for: "In the Interest of D. M. (Dissenting Opinion)"
Results 401 - 420
of 718
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
In his concurring opinion, Justice Kennedy wrote that "[i]t is important to confirm that a premise of the Court’s opinion is its assumption that the HHS regulation here at issue furthers a legitimate and compelling interest in the health of female employees. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:42 am
By Stuart M. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 11:36 am
Nothing in either the majority or the “dissenting” opinion changes that. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:23 pm
Eleanor M. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Yet it is particularly interesting as the issue arises in the wake of the victory of Mr. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:46 am
Today, as part of my stint guest-blogging about Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution, I’m going to talk about free speech. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 6:05 am
Defendants would point to the majority opinion and Judge Prost's dissent on parts of the reasoning. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:49 am
I'm sure the Federal Circuit was aware of the ongoing California litigation over the '647 patent. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:58 pm
I'm a criminal defense lawyer. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:58 pm
Inevitably, I’m going to feel torn here. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:04 am
For that reason, the dissent, and several commentators, have stressed that this is really a case about joint works and the Aalmuhammed opinion should control the outcome. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 10:02 pm
I have witnessed FSIS managers exclude employees from productive work because it is easier to avoid a dissenting opinion than to consider it. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
The crux of the dispute—between Chief Judge Kozinski and the dissenting Judge Smith—is whether Cindy Garcia has a copyright interest in her performance. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 12:42 pm
This is an interesting question, but I’m inclined to the majority’s view on it. 5. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 10:44 pm
I’m primarily a litigator. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 11:13 am
Michael Eakin wrote a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Ronald D. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 8:02 am
PPD-28 is long on rhetoric about how “all persons should be treated with dignity and respect, regardless of their nationality or wherever they might reside, and [how] all persons have legitimate privacy interests in the handling of their personal information. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm
” 522 U.S. 136, 153, n.6 (1997) (Stevens, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:02 am
But I thought I’d post today about three possible interests — protecting health, providing for sex equality, and protecting newly created private rights — and say a few words about them. 1. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm
What will be interesting will be to see how broadly, or narrowly, the Chief Justice (who as the dissenter in Randolph is likely to keep the majority opinion here) will write. [read post]
