Search for: "In the Interest of SB" Results 401 - 420 of 1,918
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
There isn't any further commentary needed so visit the other article if you're interested in reading more. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:32 am by David DePaolo
You know that in my opinion, so far, SB 863 has not delivered on its promises to insured employers.Self insured employers, however, seem to have reaped great benefit. [read post]
Foley is here to help our clients effectively address the short-term and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on their business interests, operations, and objectives, and the “new normal” we find ourselves in today. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 7:27 am by Kristin Bergman
Though influenced primarily by the plight of those in Newtown, SB 1149 makes no distinction based on the gravity or brutality of the homicide, or any other factor that may relate to the strength of the privacy interest. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
 It goes on:The Court concludes that plaintiffs have raised a "fair question" about whether SB 1564 unnecessarily burdens their right to be free from government compelled speech to a degree more than necessary to serve the state's interest in educating patients.CatholicCitizens.org provides a lengthier analysis of the decision. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The State Defendants have not contested that SB 23-190 burdens Bella Health’s religious practice. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:46 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Grits readers have seen most of the arguments before, but for those interested, see it here. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 8:51 am by Howard Friedman
The purpose of Rule 65 is to prevent defendants from creating schemes to evade judicial review and enforcement by ensuring that injunctive relief “not only binds the parties defendants but also those identified with them in interest, in ‘privity’ with them, represented by them or subject to their control. [read post]
26 May 2013, 7:04 am by David Snyder
If it passes, SB 1739 would amend the state’s Eminent Domain Act:   “The following provisions of law may include express grants of the power to acquire property by condemnation or eminent domain: Chicago Casino Development Authority Act; City of Chicago; for the purposes of the Act”   The legislation further provides that acquisition of property for a casino could be considered a “public use”:   “For the lawful purposes of this Act, the… [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 10:19 pm by Richard Frank
SB 389 is actually part of a broader effort by the Legislature–and public interest groups–to reform and update California’s water laws. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:35 am by Jerri Lynn Ward, J.D.
HB 658: Relating to interest on damages subject to Medicare subrogation. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 9:58 am by Joanna Herzik
Interest on Lawyers’ Trust Accounts (IOLTA) is a significant funding source for legal aid services in Texas, but those funds have decreased significantly due to historically low interest rates. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:12 am by David DePaolo
Today I, along with a thousand other interested folks, will migrate to Rancho Mirage, CA for the annual Winter Conference of the California Applicant Attorneys Association (actual start of the conference is Thursday and continues through Sunday).CAAA has two conferences a year. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 9:58 am by Joanna Herzik
Interest on Lawyers’ Trust Accounts (IOLTA) is a significant funding source for legal aid services in Texas, but those funds have decreased significantly due to historically low interest rates. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 12:29 pm by Ilya Somin
Nonetheless, if SB 50 passes, it would still represent massive progress, for much the same reason as SB 827 would have, had it passed. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 7:33 am by Charla Bizios Stevens
Those who have an interest in this issue should keep a watchful eye on this bill and consider contacting their own Senators or members of the committee to express their thoughts. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 4:22 pm by On the Net
State of Arizona that stays the enforcement of parts of Arizona’s illegal immigration law known as SB 1070, should read the entire 36 page Order. [read post]