Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 401 - 420
of 5,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
Muenzen Speciality Co., 1 F.T.C. 30 (1917); see also FTC Workshop at 11 [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
The SBA advises that each of the new interim final rules, including the Forgiveness IFR, are to be interpreted consistently with each other and with the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)[1], but any discrepancy or conflict that may exist is to be resolved in favor of the Economic Aid Act. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:19 pm
The Family Procedure Rules 2010 – not to be confused with the Family ProceedINGS Rules 1991 (as amended) – are now available for your delectation. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
This amendment was withdrawn. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:14 am
… IT IS ORDERED that the Rules of Criminal Procedure are amended in accordance with the attachment to this order, effective July 1, 2023. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:02 pm
Please see the pdf for exact wording of the amendments. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
Does 1-10, No. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
Next on the docket was AE 118, a motion to abate the proceedings until the security structure ordered by the commission in protective order #1 and its various amendments was in place. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 1:24 am
The appeal further requested rectification of the impugned decision under Article 109(1) EPC and the reimbursement of the appeal fee under Rule 103(1)(a) EPC.IV. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:01 pm
On November 16, 2022, Morin Golan moved to intervene in this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 24. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:09 am
Rule 7-1(10) allows the opposing party to issue a written demand requiring the listing party to amend the original list and produce documents that should have been disclosed under Rule 7-1(1)(a)(i); c. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:00 pm
In the decision under appeal, the opposition division came to the conclusion that:- the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request, the first auxiliary request as well as the fourth auxiliary request did not meet the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC;- the subject-matter of claim 1 of the second auxiliary request did not meet the requirements of Article 54 EPC; and- the third auxiliary request was not to be admitted into the opposition proceedings.III. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 1:42 pm
It is noteworthy that the elements of a negligence claim are different from the elements of a claim under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:35 am
It submitted arguments as to why the subject-matter of claim 1 of each of the requests met the requirements of Article 56 EPC. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:24 am
Giants” featured Dryer playing in 10% of its run time. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:50 am
The matter will now go to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which has proven amiable to limits on the Second Amendment. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 8:01 am
”What it means: Before this law, the issue of complying with immigration document requirements was purely a federal matter. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:22 am
If approved, the proposed amendments would not become effective until Dec. 1, 2015. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm
Additionally, “in the interests of completeness and finality[,]” the Court of Appeal went on to reject all of plaintiff’s legal challenges on their substantive merits, holding that the CCC (1) did not improperly negotiate changes to the port plan amendment, (2) correctly found the Convention Center expansion was not appealable to it (meaning it need not conform to Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act), and (3) made sufficient and supported Coastal Act and CEQA… [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Last week’s post discussed how the federal government’s investigation into Alex Levin provides a compelling illustration of the Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule. [read post]
