Search for: "Interest of Th"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
Whеn conditions аrе іn thе bеѕt interest of both thе government and thе tаxрауеr, оthеr орtіоnѕ fоr reducing the іmрасt оf lіеnѕ exist. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 10:51 am
Registration of a sign may be refused on the basis of the public policy exception provided for in Article 3(1)(f) of the Trade Mark Directive only if the sign consists exclusively of a work pertaining to the public domain and if registration of that sign would constitute a genuine and sufficiently serious threat to a fundamental interest of society. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:45 am
It would have been interesting to know what results a consumer survey on the acceptance of the word apple would have revealed. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:32 am
The judgment broadens the concept of ‘(infringing) trademark use’ based on, particularly, the advertisement and investment functions of trademarks, and emphasizes the interest of trademark owners in controlling the first placing of their goods on the EEA market. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 12:02 am
Defensive filings covering additional goods and services of interest may be advantageous. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 12:46 am
In the end, the Court ordered the defendant to pay 858.526,25 euros plus interest, which constituted the average profit obtained by the alleged infringer, according to the calculations made by an expert accountant. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 10:00 am
In that frаmе оf mіnd, уоu’ll jumр on аnу ѕоlutіоn уоu can thіnk оf and perhaps agree to ѕоmеthіng that іѕ nоt in your bеѕt interest. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 1:00 am
The appellant's professional representative informed the European Patent Office (EPO) in a letter dated "6**(th) January 2016" that the appellant had been unable to observe the time limit for the payment of the renewal fee "due to very unexpected subjective reasons and personal unforeseen circumstances". [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 6:30 am
A bunch of interesting decisions coming out of CA11:1. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 12:48 am
The SPC held that allowing a patentee to arbitrarily delete any Markush element would bring uncertainty to the patent breadth of a Markush claim, which is detrimental to public interests. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 9:25 am
In this post, we identify several such provisions that are likely to be of particular interest to Lawfare readers (though we do not discuss provisions relating to research and development or the procurement of new military equipment). [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 4:01 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:32 am
So, it’s no wonder that there is an increasing interest in utilising mediation to overcome these challenges, help manage risk, and obtain global solutions.Whilst Mediation seems to have previously been somewhat overlooked in the arsenal of IP dispute resolution, this book makes a compelling case for the problem-solving approach that overcomes challenges of court procedure and legal application, to provide parties with an effective way to create value in IP disputes.This book, edited… [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm
An idea may give rise to a cognizable property right or interest only if novel and original. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:56 am
Dоnt fоrget аbоut thе shame and tо ignore, Yоur life can be ruined. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 7:58 am
Fortunately, it is not a war of biblical dimensions, but only a lawsuit, a significant and legally interesting one though, about an Supplementary Protection Certificate. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 9:23 am
From a procedural perspective, it is interesting to note that Mondelez’ appeal was found inadmissible, because Mondelez had won before the General Court. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:16 pm
Th[is] visualization shows the board member connections within the 50 largest public companies (if two companies share at least one board member, then they are flagged as connected). [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 3:50 am
It referred to the fact that the European Court of Justice (ECJ) repeatedly acknowledged and strengthened the interest of the owners of prestigious brands to protect their luxury image. [read post]
