Search for: "International Paper Co. v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Should the rules of constitutional amendment in Article V be interpreted strictly, even if this legalistic interpretation holds back the realization of equality embedded in the formative texts of the United States, including the Declaration of Independence, the Reconstruction Dismerberments, and the many franchise-expanding constitutional changes since then? [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:07 pm by Benjamin Wittes
And the facts in this case “support the judgment that DoD’s operation in Yemen would be conducted as part of the non-international armed conflict between the United States and al-Qaida”: Specifically, DoD proposes to target a leader of AQAP, an organized enemy force that is either a component of al-Qaida or that is a co-belligerent of that central party to the conflict and engaged in hostilities against the United States as part… [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Cir. 1996) ("The nonobviousness of the accused device, evidenced by the grant of a United States patent, is relevant to the issue of whether the change therein is substantial. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 9:31 pm by Josh Blackman
Spiro is the Co-Director of the Institute for International Law and Public Policy. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Flowers Foods is the second-largest commercial bakery in the United States whose brands include Wonder Bread, Tastykake, Sunbeam, and Nature’s Own. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
(IPKat) United States US General Interview with White House ‘IP Czar’, Victoria Espinel (PatLit) When a school boy’s trick meets strangers in a train (or in the Air) – trade secrets and strangers: E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v Christopher (IPKat) USPTO invites comments on strategic plan (IP Watch) (USPTO) US Patent Reform Unreasonable patent applicant delay and the USPTO backlog (Patently-O) US Patents June IP Update podcast: Bilski,… [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
  The paper originally published by the Gazette of Law and Journalism  Part 1 of the paper was posted on 22 February 2011. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit)   United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:42 am by Wendy Akbar
The most substantial e-discovery costs arise from the attorney review process, regardless of whether that review is done internally by firm lawyers or outsourced to vendors in the United States or abroad. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
For coauthored papers, the presenting author is listed first. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:45 am by Allison Walton
This is true not only for Asian countries transacting with each other, but increasingly with Europe and the United States. [read post]