Search for: "JOHNSON v. SHORT" Results 401 - 420 of 1,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2010, 4:49 am by Maxwell Kennerly
" In short, the Third Circuit held that the "virtually impossible" language from Victaluic Co. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 9:50 pm
BBC Ice Cream, LLC, Opposition No. 91158491 [Section 2(d) opposition to ICE CREAM for "Clothing, namely, jackets, coats, parkas, raincoats, blazers, blouses, shirts, t-shirts, skirts, dresses, trousers, jeans, shorts, sweaters, cardigans, scarves and belts; footwear; headwear, " on the ground of likelihood of confusion with Opposer's registered marks ICE, ICEBERG, and various other ICE-FORMATIVE marks for clothing items].October 20, 2009 - 2 PM: Johnson &… [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 6:14 am
Johnson White House Diary 3 Apr. (1970) 382   A young newspaper-woman in a black-and-white polka-dot bikini, with a figure to suit it....1957    V. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am by John Elwood
Thanks to Kevin Brooks for compiling all these cases, and special thanks to Aurora Temple Barnes for making 20 new case pages (and rephrasing the questions presented to SCOTUSblog style) on such short notice. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:20 am by Rosalind English
  There is very strong authority to the effect that the courts have no discretion to grant any relief going beyond the remedy which Parliament has seen fit to provide (see Johnson v Unisys Ltd [2003] 1 AC 518). [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
A short explanation of relists is available here. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:47 pm
Similar to the Johnson court, albeit in a theft context as opposed to possession, the court in People v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am by John Elwood
” (relisted after the Oct. 27 conference) Returning Relists Johnson v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am by Richard Hunt
The short concurrence from Judge White is worth noting because she rejects a per se rule that someone barred from membership cannot suffer an injury, agreeing only that in this case the plaintiff failed to allege an injury. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
United States permitting application of the “modified categorical approach,” or rather, whether “touches or strikes” is a single indivisible element requiring the categorical approach and a finding under Johnson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
” In an interview at PRI, Kevin Johnson discusses the court’s decision this week in Jennings v. [read post]