Search for: "JOHNSON v. SHORT" Results 401 - 420 of 1,142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2018, 11:26 am by Jeffrey Carr
Jansen Pharmaceuticals, part of Johnson & Johnson, devloped the drug and manufactures it. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
Consider, for example the case of Louis Milic, a computational stylistician, who studied the relative frequency of initial determiners and initial connectives in the sentences of Swift, Macaulay, Addison, Gibbon and Samuel Johnson. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
Consider, for example the case of Louis Milic, a computational stylistician, who studied the relative frequency of initial determiners and initial connectives in the sentences of Swift, Macaulay, Addison, Gibbon and Samuel Johnson. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
” In an interview at PRI, Kevin Johnson discusses the court’s decision this week in Jennings v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:30 am by NCC Staff
In a separate concurring opinion, Justice Johnson advocated for a more expansive reading of the Commerce Clause. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Because both votes fell short–by one vote–of the two-thirds majority needed to convict Johnson, he was judged not guilty and remained in office. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 9:57 am by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
Higdon actually does much more and provides a nice outline about the state of violent-felony jurisprudence after Johnson v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am by Richard T. Kaplar
Circuit affirmed the FCC’s regulatory authority over ISPs in 2014, the leap to Title II would prove to be a short one. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am by Richard T. Kaplar
Circuit affirmed the FCC’s regulatory authority over ISPs in 2014, the leap to Title II would prove to be a short one. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:11 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" After the lower federal courts issued conflicting rulings about how long or short the stop must be to trigger Fourth Amendment protections, the Supreme Court in Rodriguez v. [read post]