Search for: "JOINES v. JOINES."
Results 401 - 420
of 31,047
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
UPDATED ON JUNE 26, 2013: In a landmark decision penned by Justice Kennedy, in which Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined (Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito dissenting), the United States Supreme Court held that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional as a violation of equal protection pursuant to the Fifth Amendment in the case United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:40 pm
Justice Sotomayor delivered the opinion of the Court, and was joined by all but Justice Thomas (who concurred in the judgment) and Chief Justice Roberts (who took no part in the decision). [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 8:52 am
Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 9:17 am
See Castro v. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 7:50 am
Circuit has joined all others: a reasonable mistake of fact will support a stop while a mistake of law will not. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 8:14 am
As Deputy AAG, Harbour argued State Oil v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 3:43 pm
In a recently reported appellate court case, Clubhouse at Fairway Pines v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:48 am
Gebr Weber GmbH v Wittmer Putz v Medianess Electronics GmbH Joined cases C-65/09 and C-87/09; [2011] WLR (D) 210 “Where consumer goods, installed in good faith by the consumer, were not in conformity with the contract under which the consumer had purchased and and were restored to conformity by way of replacement, the seller was obliged pursuant to article 3(2)(3) of Parliament and Council Directive 1999/44/EC either to remove the goods from where they had been… [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 8:05 am
llr=ofg87a44&v=0015Yzr3j_... [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:02 am
The Supreme Court is currently hearing a series of joined cases concerning extradition and the rights of children including KAS or H v The Lord Advocate UKSC 2011/0217, BH v The Lord Advocate UKSC 2011/0210 , F-K (FC) v Polish Judicial Authority UKSC 2012/0039, R (on the application of HH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa UKSC 2011/0128 and R (on the application of PH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa UKSC… [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:02 am
U.S. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 4:15 am
After the CAFC's Facebook v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:01 am
In Hittson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:55 pm
Noonan -- Mallinckrodt filed a certiorari petition with the Supreme Court last week, over the Federal Circuit panel decision (by Chief Judge Prost joined by Judge Dyk; Judge Newman dissented on the issue before the Court in this petition) affirming dismissal of a suit by Mallinckrodt's subsidiary, iNO Pharmaceuticals, in iNO Therapeutics LLC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 9:54 am
On August 27, 2014, members will join Stephen Pevar, senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), for this webinar as he gives an update on the ICWA compliance class action lawsuit, Oglala Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 9:43 pm
In the Teva v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:19 am
The United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
Tiff (Paper Image) v. [read post]
