Search for: "Jackson v. Books"
Results 401 - 420
of 833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2008, 11:58 am
Vernor v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:27 am
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court, in which Marcus discusses her 2019 book about Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing, as well as some of this term’s major cases. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Texas v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 9:40 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, overruling Roe v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 5:31 am
Quoting Justice Jackson, Justice Scalia explained, "With the law books filled with a great assortment of crimes, a prosecutor stands a fair chance of finding at least a technical violation of some act on the part of almost anyone. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:30 pm
Yesterday we looked at Hawkins v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:50 pm
ShareWednesday’s argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 7:50 am
I am currently reading a fascinating new book by Richard Ellis ,Aggressive Nationalism: McCulloch v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" http://j.mp/pYBmeY from @thewrap: "Halberstam to Graphic Novels: Top 10 Books About 9/11" http://j.mp/oERnAs from @thewrap: "9/11 Remembered: The Top 10 in Movies" http://j.mp/pBNfbl from @thewrap: "Springsteen to Alan Jackson: Top 10 Tunes About 9/11" http://j.mp/qXzE0m high court of australia handed down momcilovic v the queen today - a landmark human rights case http://j.mp/rqvkl7 #lwb242 good decision: "European Commission:… [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
EPA and more in the concerns animating Justice Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In the U.S., laws declared unconstitutional remain on the books unless repealed. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 11:32 am
Supreme Court is “slic[ing] off pieces of the famous 1966 criminal rights case, Miranda v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
As discussed here, if considered satire, not parody, Dumb Starbucks could be liable for infringement (Dr Seuss Enterprises v Penguin Books USA (1997)).It seems unlikely that adding DUMB- provides enough distinction for it to avoid being considered an unauthorised derivative of Starbucks’ copyrighted works. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:30 pm
As Justice Jackson concluded: “A military commander may overstep the bounds of constitutionality, and it is an incident. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
De LaRosa's semantic alchemy defies the criteria for gang activity as defined inthe CDCR rules and regulations, as well as the standard set forth in the1994 case Castillo v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 12:14 pm
Lee v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm
Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:50 am
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was sworn in on June 30th, 2022. [read post]
