Search for: "James v. Holder" Results 401 - 420 of 646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Holder dealt in part with the effect of the Copyright Act of 1790. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:19 pm
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Terri L. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:24 am by Terry Hart
As the Supreme Court said in Eldred v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:11 am by Dianne Saxe
  Dianne Saxe and Meredith James This article was prepared for the excellent blog SLAW ©2012 Environmental Law and Litigation. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am by Barry Barnett
Patent holder’s grant of right to license patent didn’t deprive it of standing to sue for infringement. 22-2207.OPINION.5-1-2024_2310958.pdf (uscourts.gov) Infringement judgment didn’t become final before unpatentability decision did. 22-2064.OPINION.5-2-2024_2311705.pdf (uscourts.gov) Patent holder’s effort to stop Utah company from making sales that holder claimed infringed its patent made it subject to personal jurisdiction in Utah.… [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am by Erin Miller
At the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse blog, Richard Samp has observations on the Court’s decision last week in Holder v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
In DPP v James McConnell [2016] NIMag 1, a preacher was acquitted in a prosecution under s 127(1)(a) of the Communications Act 2003 for posting a video of a sermon in which he asserted, inter alia, that “Islam’s ideas about God about humanity, about salvation are vastly different from the teaching of the Holy Scriptures. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am by Ben
In the wake of the CJEU's decision in Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and Others (case C‑360/13) which held that browsing and viewing articles online does not require authorisation from the copyright holder, The PRCA has rejected an offer of a meeting with the Copyright Licensing Agency because it says it falls short of the terms it called for. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 12:50 pm by Florian Mueller
Curiel in the Southern District of California (at a recent hearing) and Judge James L. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:09 am by James Morphy, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP,
Editor's Note: James Morphy is a partner at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP specializing in mergers & acquisitions and corporate governance. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:51 pm
Furthermore, it was made it clear that Article 4(2) is not limited to tangible copies, but applies equally to intangible copies, including where the copy is sold as corrected and updated by the copyright holder. [read post]