Search for: "James v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 4,931
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2006, 4:13 pm
United States, 14 Ct. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 12:00 pm
By “valid mark,” I mean a mark that meets the requirements for one in the United States. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
June 29, 2011), and State of Florida v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 5:07 pm
This summary accompanies the oral argument video:Pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 64, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana certified the following questions of Indiana state law for the Indiana Supreme Court's consideration, which the Indiana Supreme Court accepted on February 22, 2006: 1. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 7:42 pm
United States Agency for International Development ... [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:23 pm
In Pennsylvania v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
Oei, James M. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 3:12 am
Dustin Jansen, The Role of United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 3:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 2:12 pm
United States and Kahn v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 2:53 pm
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act)Western Refining Southwest, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:45 am
See James v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 11:38 am
He raises four challenges to his convictions and sentence: that his trial violated the Speedy Trial Act, that his firearm possession convictions are multiplicitous, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, and that his term of supervised release was imposed in violation of United States v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
Allen Stanford, James M. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm
The United States Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 7:31 am
In a recent decision, the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:27 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 8:13 pm
United States (9th Cir., Jan. 7, 2019, case no. 18-36082); -United States v. [read post]
