Search for: "Jane Does 1 - 2" Results 401 - 420 of 1,007
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm by Sarah Grant
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly’s order last month in Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Affiliated Ute Does Not Apply to Claims Based Primarily on Misstatements The Second Circuit agreed with defendants that the district court should not have given plaintiffs the benefit of the Affiliated Ute Adhering to two of its prior decisions, the court held that Affiliated Ute does not apply to claims based “primarily” on affirmative misstatements, as opposed to omissions.[6] The court noted that the alleged omissions were “simply the inverse” of the… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am by Marty Lederman
  Later that day, by a 2-1 vote, it stayed those portions of the injunction that prohibited HHS from preventing others from transporting Doe to a facility for the abortion and “from interfering with or obstructing J.D. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:53 pm
No visa program - whether K-1, B-2, H-1B, immigrant, Visa Waiver, or DV - does NOT have a counterterrorism and security check screening. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:30 am by Sarah Grant
District Court for the District of Columbia issued a memorandum opinion and order in the case of Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
  There has been some very good scholarship and journalism, notably by Theda Skocpol and Jane Mayer, exploring that question. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:58 am by Colby Pastre
Sixty-five years ago, he noted that the corporate tax could force capital from the corporate sector to the no-corporate sector, reducing returns to noncorporate businesses, which would suffer some of the burden of the corporate tax.[2] He assumed a closed economy, where the capital remained in the country, but shifted sectors. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Jane Doe clearly has a right under relevant Supreme Court precedents to terminate her pregnancy. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Matthew Kahn
” Section 2 also creates a mechanism for filling the vice presidential vacancies that ensue. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 5:32 pm by Jane Bambauer
This example illustrates a non-material attribute (Δ1 = 0) and an over-reaction (Δ2>0). [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 11:37 am by Rachel Gerber
In a 2-1 opinion, the court concluded that "adjudicating Doe's claim would require judicial interference into a wide range of military function, triggering the incident-to-service rule... [read post]
Plaintiff specifically alleged the defendants violated Missouri Revised Statute § 430.225 by: (1) directly paying his medical lien holders without first obtaining his permission, and by (2) improperly paying those lien holders more than 50% of his settlement. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
Part 2 | It may be use, but is it trade mark use? [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:29 am by William Theisen
The five servicemembers, identified as Jane Does 1 through 5, are represented by... [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:47 am by Eric Goldman
The Court will not dismiss the claims of Plaintiffs John Doe #8, Jane Does #9-10, John Doe #11, and David Ellis under Section 230 of the CDA. [read post]