Search for: "Jeffrey Reasons" Results 401 - 420 of 4,479
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm by Jeffrey May
by Jeffrey May Wolters Kluwer Law & Business The government’s successful prosecution of AU Optronics Corporation, its wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary, and two former company executives serves as a cautionary tale. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:40 am
I think when the right was disappointed in Bush - which we often were - it was for substantive (and substantial) reasons. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:17 pm by Rory Little
Arguing for Heien, attorney Jeffrey Fisher had “struggle[d]” to limit the Court’s ruling “solely [to] the exclusionary rule” – that is, the remedy – in lieu of a more general ruling about the right (that is, whether the officer’s stop was an “unreasonable” violation of the amendment). [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 4:30 pm
Credit Report Resellers Settle FTC Data Privacy AllegationsThis posting was written by Jeffrey May, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.Three companies whose business is reselling consumers’ credit reports have agreed to settle FTC charges that they did not take reasonable steps to protect consumers’ personal information—failures that allowed computer hackers to access that data. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:18 pm
Intel also failed to identify any basis for a reasonable person to question Commissioner Rosch’s ability to be impartial in adjudicating the proceeding, according to the Commission.Commissioner Rosch’s StatementIn his separate statement, Commissioner Rosch explained his reasons for declining to recuse himself from further participation in the Intel proceeding. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:44 am by Christina Steinbrecker
Skilling, the 5th Circuit denied former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling’s conspiracy conviction appeal. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:01 am
The court also rejected Apple's contention that its agency agreements with the publishers should be found lawful under a rule of reason analysis because they were simply agreements by a principal to set the price charged by its agent. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:06 pm by Kevin
Of course, a Kansas jury would probably convict anyone they saw in a top hat for that reason alone, but hey—nobody made him get a tattoo. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 5:42 am
Gorsuch might think the 1960s cases were not well-grounded in the Constitution and merely want to use that a reason to refuse to recognize any additional legal rights. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:05 am
For this reason, it’s possible that some liberal Supreme Court justices might conclude that the Stupak amendment violates the Constitution. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 11:28 am by Jeffrey May
by Jeffrey May Wolters Kluwer Law & Business George Mason University (GMU) Law Professor Joshua D. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:34 pm
The company contends that, as a quasi-public, state-created health care corporation, it only needs to show that the challenged conduct reasonably flowed from Michigan's policy to displace competition. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 5:05 am by SHG
Simpson, Mike Tyson and Jeffrey Epstein. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 4:15 pm by Lawrence Solum
Jeffrey Miller (McGill University (2014); Western Univ. (2009-12); Law and Justice Research Centre) has posted French Fries Are Meat: The Legal Poetics of Getting from Law to Justice on SSRN. [read post]