Search for: "John Doe 63"
Results 401 - 420
of 595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2022, 2:13 pm
”[2] The Court in Basic and Halliburton II left unanswered a critical question regarding price impact: how long does it take new, value-relevant information to impact the stock price of a security trading in an efficient market? [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 pm
An Issues Brief by John G. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
In re St John the Baptist, Penshurst The judgment In re St John the Baptist, Penshurst [2015] Court of Arches relates to the relocation of a chancel screen to another church within the same diocese, and is reviewed in our post, here. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Int’l L. 37-63 (2010).Vendzules, Sarah Fick. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
Quoted in Another Obamacare Test Looms for Chief Justice John Roberts (1), Bloomberg Law (Mar. 3, 2020). [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Haldeman, and former White House Assistant for Domestic Affairs John D. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
The Anti-Torture MemosArranged by topicWe've previously compiled a running list of all posts related to civil liberties, the War on Terror, and presidential power, listed by author.By popular demand, here is a list of the essays grouped by topic. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Admittedly the Justice case recently experienced a vogue of attention in the United States, particularly among lawyers looking for possible precedents for bringing charges against the authors of the “torture memos” in Bush’s Justice Department.[4] But even this brief renaissance of interest quickly waned as the precedential relevance of the Justice appeared smaller than hoped.[5] The fact that the NMT program has long been treated as nothing more than a footnote to the IMT… [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:31 am
. # The Court reiterates that Article 6 § 3 (c) may be relevant at the stage of the preliminary investigation in so far as the fairness of the trial is likely to be seriously prejudiced by an initial failure to comply with its provisions (see John Murray v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 8 February 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 I, § 62). [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
” What does this mean? [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
This extension will be provided automatically and does not require a request by disputing parties. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:58 am
Dismissal Motion Rulings By my reckoning, about 144 of the cases, or about 63%, have reached the motion to dismiss stage. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
Question: What does it mean for the Supreme Court to be “pro-business”? [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Does Gonzales v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
Of course, this does not settle the theoretical question. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:13 am
Chief Justice John Roberts seemed to disagree. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:03 pm
How does that transposition of the municipal to the international occur? [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
In 2008, former Bronx County Supreme Court Justice John A. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am
Four other justices – Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and Stephen Breyer – disagreed; they would have allowed courts to review partisan-gerrymandering claims. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 2:03 pm
Id. at 862–63 (citing Jack B. [read post]
