Search for: "John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp" Results 401 - 420 of 454
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2009, 2:25 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property 'First Sale' Doctrine Does Not Protect Foreign-Made Books From Copyright Act §602(a)(1) Import Bar John Wiley & Sons Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:53 pm
  In rulemaking not only does one size not fit all, but it's unsafe to think that it can. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:11 am
Army Corps of Engineers has the authority to issue permits for dumping dredge or fill dirt into a waterway, without satisfying all of the pollution limits that are enforced by the Environmental Protection Agency (Coeur Alaska v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
John's University School of Law and New York Law School, commented: "... [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps FotoMedia Technologies – FotoMedia sues more than 60 companies between 2007 and 2008 over alleged infringement of patents relating to online photo sharing and organising (The Prior Art) Microsoft - Microsoft patents the crippling of operating… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps FotoMedia Technologies – FotoMedia sues more than 60 companies between 2007 and 2008 over alleged infringement of patents relating to online photo sharing and organising (The Prior Art) Microsoft - Microsoft patents the crippling of operating… [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
The Supremes held that section 1447(d) does not apply to abstention-based remands, and the remand order was thus reviewable on appeal.In Powerex Corp. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Federal Express Corp., No. 07-10555 (5th Cir. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
Although the ruling in Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation)   US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR obviousness: Pivonka… [read post]