Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 401 - 420
of 7,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
I haven’t yet had a chance to read the article and its wealth of footnotes in great detail, but I will offer a few comments: 1. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 1:26 pm
John McCain. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm
But what does it have to do with insider trading? [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
See Dkt 86, at 1:28- 2:2 (“it appears that these persons, and their related entities, may have defrauded the Court through their acts and representations in these cases. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 11:23 am
” In general, however, a PI should only issue after weighing "(1) the likelihood of the patentee’s success on the merits; (2) irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted; (3) the balance of hardships between the parties; and (4) the public interest. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 4:38 pm
Id. at *2-*3. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 1:42 pm
Multistate E. coli O26 Outbreak, Jimmy John’s restaurants alfalfa sprouts 2012 29 Sickened – A total of 29 individuals infected with the outbreak strain of E. coli O26 were reported from 11 states, including: Alabama (1), Arkansas (1), Iowa (5), Kansas (2), Michigan (10), Missouri (3), Ohio (3), Pennsylvania (1), Washington (1), Wisconsin (1), and West Virginia (1). [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:22 am
So the chances of a refusal being affirmed are probably higher than 2 to 1.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:01 am
Some states have mandatory legal malpractice insurance, but New York does not. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:01 am
Texas 52 Rice 10 As the Owls (2-2) served up their annual sacrificial lamb offering to the Longhorns (3-0), does anyone else think the Horns' soft schedule may make them prime meat for an upset at Boulder by Colorado (3-0) two weeks from now? [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:55 pm
On November 17, 1973, the White House informed Federal District Judge John Sirica that the 18 1/2 minute Nixon-Haldeman conversation of June 20, 1972, had been erased. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:11 am
Yedor, 2019 USPQ2d 111513, *3 (TTAB 2019).For a Section 2(a) claim, standing “does not rise or fall on the basis of a plaintiff’s proprietary rights in a term; rather, a Section 2(a) plaintiff has standing by virtue of who the plaintiff is, that is, the plaintiff’s personality or ‘persona. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:37 am
Fourth in Our Series on Strategy: Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3 Law Factory, Education Factory Law Firm Investment Portfolios Legal Billing Rates: The Next Wave 2 Legal Project Management and the Law Factory Tier 1: Know Thyself The Law Factory Debate: Another Perspective The Stratified Legal Market and its Implications [Photo Credit: Jake Bouma] [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 2:28 am
Application argued (1) that just because there is a vehicle called a "monster truck" does not mean that "monster" is descriptive of automotive accessories, (2) that "monster" per se has no direct relationship with automotive accessories, and (3) because average consumers do not drive monster trucks, the word "monster" does not directly describe automotive accessories. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:00 am
John Does 1-85, Civil Action No. 3:11cv469 (E.D. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 7:48 am
There is much at its core that is appealing ion the principles--if not in the actual language--of the Zero Draft. 3. [read post]
TTAB Finds KOTA JAPAN Primarily Geographically Deceptively Misdescriptive for Knife Sharpening Tools
18 Jun 2020, 3:22 am
Applicant contended that the distinctive term KOTA (having no known meaning on the record) is the dominant element of the mark and therefore the mark as a whole does not violate Section 2(e)(3). [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:22 am
Judge Lykos thinks so too.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:02 am
" The identified general exceptions are: (1) where "a would-be Doe who reasonably fears that coming out of the shadows will cause him unusually severe harm (either physical or psychological)"; (2) where "identifying the would-be Doe would harm 'innocent non-parties'"; (3) where "anonymity is necessary to forestall a chilling effect on future litigants who may be similarly situated"; and (4) where the suit is… [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:42 am
There are three sources that establish and/or address this secondary market standard: 1) IRC section 5891; 2) the state structured settlement protection statutes; and 3) judicial interpretations of the "best interest" standard. [read post]
