Search for: "Johnson v. Georgia" Results 401 - 420 of 513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
Johnson signed into law the Voting Rights Act of 1965, on Aug. 6 of that year. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
This ruling, while it may be crazy, is Georgia law.HawaiiThe Aloha State hasn't said "aloha" to this issue yet. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
" Petito, 750 So.2d at 106-07.GeorgiaThe law in Georgia is limited to a federal court's prediction that Georgia law would not allow independent medical monitoring claims. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Other notable online defamation decisions included the case of a ‘revenge blogger’ who was ordered to take down a blog about his former partner which violated a harassment restraining order (Johnson v. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 7:01 am by Sara Bjerg Moller
But neither of the two missions the transatlantic alliance undertook in Afghanistan—the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and Resolute Support—were Article V missions. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am by John Elwood
Petitioner Pankajkumar Patel checked a box on a Georgia driver’s license application falsely stating that he is a U.S. citizen, even though he was eligible for a license regardless of his citizenship. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Michael Geist has examined the case of Google v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:40 pm by admin
And then in 1992, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 6:01 pm by Joy Waltemath
” It could conceive of no circumstances when calling a subordinate that name would be acceptable (Johnson v STRIVE East Harlem Employment Group). [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
  Justice Scalia was on the rifle team as a teenager and Justice Thomas grew up in rural Georgia. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 pm
’” Likewise quoted with approval is the 1846 Georgia Supreme Court decision Nunn v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
The Andrew Johnson administration understood [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]